Into Wiesbedan. *

Obviously I wish good luck with that — it gets its smattering of press news such as this, and .  and this, and the customary posting in the updates at the Dennis King website. 

It’s interesting to see a comment from the “Mikey Powell Campaign” on this site.  Must stick together, I guess you can say.
Go to factnet and you will see some former members expressing their frustration with, say for instance, the sponsorship of two people (rhymes with “Dertlet” and “Ring”) — long time “enemies” of the Larouche franchise who you might argue bring their own biases to the front, I suppose.  I suggest my incredulity in the comments section for the previous post — proofread it not at all. * — But to put some things into perspective, we have the inestimable “Howie G”:

European, why don’t you face it, you’re over your head. You are caught in the middle of disputes that will determine the future course of civilization.

Good god almighty.  Note to revenire:  The reason your supposed “jokes” ala “I’ve saved the world numerous times” are taken with a straight faced is because they bear no difference, and are actually rather tamer, than the straight-forward prose of the Larouche organization in describing their mission.  I suppose it would make for an Andy Kaufman routine, if it were not part and parcel of, for instance:

If we don’t get enough money in, I’m going to kill somebody. [laughs]

Ha ha ha!  It’s funny because… it has a ring of truth about… his sociopathology.  Ha ha ha!

Well, in all honesty this “Windy Hills Dialouge” is par for the course, and there is nothing new here.  I note that “Dialouge” is re-defined as “Monolouge with smattering of an ‘Amen’ Choir.”  But I see that “Howie G” has read that “Windy Hills Monolouge” and fully digested said.

I’m in the center of this. That’s my responsibility. Either we succeed, and I know that I’m crucial in this, or we go down. But you have these points. Essentially, you have Helga in Germany, as a key point of reference. It’s a reference for Russia and other places as well. Jacques in France, is in a fairly strong, relative position. The Four, the United States, Russia, China, and India, are coming into existence, and there are some meetings coming up now, which are these four! Hillary Clinton is playing a very significant role in respect to these four, as Secretary of State. Her meeting with Lavrov was highly successful, for its purpose.
So, we have inside the United States, our circle inside the United States, which is now focused around the Obama Presidency; Russia around an inside group in Russia, which is actually the leadership group in Russia; some influence in China, but that could be consolidated with the aid of Russia; and India. That is essentially what we have here, there. That is now the pattern. And what I’m doing, in terms of the question of economy is crucial, because if this were not done, if what I’m pushing were not to happen, there’s no change of avoiding a dark age. And what I’m trying to push through with Obama and Company, against all the enemies and fools and whatnot, is crucial.
That means, in the United States, that the LPAC operation is strategically significant, and will determine the future of civilization. So we are going to have a full-blast approach, politically and in fundraising, centered on LPAC. We have to get the $120,000 a week. {We have to.}
Nothing else is going to work, unless that works. Don’t talk about alternatives, or adjustments — forget it! It’s a fool’s errand.

The Four Powres Alliance, supposedly what the organization is working with, and it takes $120K a week from pestering your grandma on the phone to get it, and theoretically nickeling and diming from donations on street corner card table shrines with the latest ill-produced pamphlet thingamajing.  Well, anyway, the “4 Powers Alliance” is the pretend International Biggie they’re pushing.  The REAL International project can be found off of Parade’s Annual List of the “Top 10 Worst Dictators“.

Mugabe of Zimbabwe.  Al Bashir of Sudan. Khamenei of Iran*.  Abdullah (more to the clerics you can say) in Saudi Arabia.  And Muammar al-Qaddafi of Libya.
For Kim Jong Il, he takes credit for a rail-line (or hearlds one?), but really the Larouche — Jong Il “Economic Development” connection is more along the lines of this.

 The “International Economic Program” leads its way to this Canadian Constituion.  I post to the comments to point to something I’ve lost and will post here if I ever find.  In the meantime, translate this Hegla Zepp boilerplate anti-video game connected to violent crime item to English and read down the list of articles at the bottom — Most Illuminating to see the mileu we’re travelling through!
……………………………………….

** To tie up a loose end in that assortment of comments, while it’s true that he’s “more idiosyncratic” and probably better asserted as coming out of a “Stalinist Left”) here’s where I find “Hitler” specifically in the wide world of Larouche (beyond the various alliances at various times with neo-nazis and attendent items, beyond anti-semitism which I don’t know what to put down as)  — a quote from factnet:
First off, he certainly lacks any of the demagogic skills to attract any type of mass base, second, the West is not in the total debilitated state that Weimar Germany was in after the war (although that could certainly change given current economic condiations).

 It is, in Larouche’s world, the world situation is always in the state that Weimar Germany was in, and the paranthetical is what Larouche is going after in, well, theoretically the public imagination but in practice never really beyond the cadres — and I have never been able to read that (and before I em-meshed myself as fully in paying  the attention I have — independent curiosity-seeking) as anything than a mimicry of Hitler.  Surely the Communist Left have that ideology of worsening conditions for the proleteriat being preferable to “crumbs” thrown by the bourgeoise in order to “wake them up”, which always resulted in a same sort of Alarmist tracts of “15 minutes toward Armegeddon”, but the frames of reference throw this particular instance of Larouche over to Hitler.
But, yes, Hitler himself disappears and can’t be shoe-horned all over the place.

…………………………………..
And now for a run into the “leatherstocking challenge”, as per a wikipedia claim to just “look at how Larouche has been referred to” in news accounts in the past fifteen years, and use that.  He sort of played it through google news, a bad gambit because of the inclusiveness with which google news operates which farms in those “Executive Intelligence Review” items and gives it an undue weight as against , say, the Financial Times of London.  I refer to that because I’ll reference a story published there, January 31, 2009 — can’t find it with immediacy on the Internet: The profit of doom: George Soros may have predicted the global economic crisis, but how is the pioneering financier protecting his fortune and his legacy? Chrystia Freeland reports. 
where we see the reference made as “extremist pamphleteer”.  Would that work for wikipedia?

This entry was posted on Monday, March 23rd, 2009 at 8:54 am and is filed under The LaRouche Challenge, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.