They tell us they have to “go along to get along,” and that LaRouche’s policies might “alienate the voters.” Now see where it’s got them. Only 11% of respondents in the latest Reuters/Zogby poll released today gave the Congress a positive mark.

… And so it is, in the Larouche World, where somebody is telling somebody something about Larouche. The further problem comes in with:

U.S. Congress Could Learn from Argentine First Lady on How to Fight the British

Larouche is back on a straight-forward uninhibited “British Empire” kick. It is more simple that way. But, while we’re looking at the British Empire, take a look at this. A bit unimportant, but firstly:

What the Ministry of Truth, Wikipedia, will never tell you, is that Sir Rupert Murdoch is a second-generation protégé of the British oligarchy’s 20th-Century propaganda baron, Lord Beaverbrook.

Hm. Now that would be an interesting thing to see in the wikipedia edits page!

More importantly, note footnote #1. The preparations have been made to ward off the Washington Monthly article — online any day now.

…………………………..

There is a topic I need to get to, which I think explains a cornerstone meme for a Larochite. But that topic will take a bit of work and thought. For more mindless fun, a fun gallop through some of the things offered as evidence of Larouche’s Political Power by, um, the now departed long time Larouchite.

I did some Googling of my own and if LaRouche is this crazy whack job he sure had some big boys conned into listening to him.

A plain falsehood. The man did not “do some googling of [his] own”.

I used to watch his old TV broadcasts (back in the 80s) and he’d make some pretty wild charges against very prominent people but they never would sue him would they? If these VIPs wanted to shut LaRouche down why not sue? Maybe someone has sued LaRouche but it wasn’t someone like Kissinger or other prominent political figures.

Have some fun with that one. It is the very definition of circular logic.

I wish they’d put the photo of Reagan and LaRouche talking up there. I bet they were talking about the weather!

There is this photograph Larouche uses for his propaganda, inrternal consumption that convinces a Larouchite of his importance, at a candidates’ forum with Reagan and Larouche. Fringe candidates along with real candidates in New Hampshire. I have you know that I have a photograph of presidential candidate John Cox along with the other Republican candidates for this year. Never mind. The Reagan administration had the strongest connections made between the Fantasy Shadow Government propped up for Larouche’s ego and the real government, running off of the fringes of the dark corridors of the Intelligence services. This would dry up relatively soon.

I also remember when Reagan attacked Dukakis over his mental health — Dukakis slipped 20 percentage points in the polls and if I remember LaRouche’s “minions” slipped the story of Dukakis mental state under the door of a the Democratic delegates.

Now that I review these comments, I can see he was largely reliving the glory days. Dukakis was a horrible candidate, easily caricatured and with a tone-deafness that makes one wonder how he succeeded in politics in the first place (Does he feel your pain?), whose main accomplishment and pitch — the “Massachusetts Miracle” — was already decaying into Recession. Gary Hart, had he stayed out of trouble, I believe would have won in 1988. And I’m sure that Larouche would have come up with something at the Democratic Convention for the purpose of convincing his cult that Larouche is a serious contender for the Democratic nomination.

Here’s another tidbit for you (I suspect you know all of this and just utter things that are false as a habit):

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2007/3437nbcsl_resolution.html

“To National Black Caucus of State Legislators

“State Rep. Juanita Walton (D) of St. Louis, representing the 81st District in Missouri’s House of Representatives

Something about this one, and the mood I was in when I saw it, prompted me to a near immediate response — with the second half of this post. More can be said about that matter — the discrepency between the amount “LarouchePac” rasies and the amount it pours into these electoral campaigns. (Hint: Memory serves, $900 is the latter figure.) Maybe I’m missing some things, but I think I have the gist of the picture down.

Dennis King and his theory that “British” is a code word for “Jew”. 

If it weren’t placed in and around other clear quasi-code words (can you really refer to “Locust Fund” as a code word?  That’s not so much a double-entendre as a single-entendre, so to speak), it just might be completely hackneyed.  It’s somewhat sympathetic — continue the Greatest War on to today, from the German vantage point.  But I can and will relent.  The war against the British Empire is not an anti-Jewish crusade — it’s just a kooky nutcase one.  Happy now?

More later, on this post. Things get a little bit weird.

This entry was posted on Friday, October 19th, 2007 at 9:12 am and is filed under The LaRouche Challenge, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.