Another Larouche testimonial
I was supporte of Lyndon Laroache for about 20 years it all started in
1979. I wish I never gotten involved with them. He was a Leon Trostsey
supporter. He stared the Labor movement I voted for him and handed out
phampets in local postal offices. I give them money for his articles
on Cheney The Children of Satan. I broke from them in 2005 after he
took all my money from me. I now realize I been lied to. I’m not shock
to learn that people are being use and taken advantage from through his
youth movements. He teaches hate all babyboomers and their culture and
music. He supported Kerry a pro war candiate. He move away from what
he stood for. I talk to them about Leon Troskey they called Leon
Troskey a sex pervert. I told them that was strange when Lyndon Laroache in
the 1970’s supported him. They called me a babyboomer and bunch of
names. I read WSWS web sites and sounded like Lyndon Laroach was ripping
them off. I need help getting my money back from them.
The problem with “SIC” is that it’s not technically correct, or at least not the root problem. “TIC” is closer, but type-writers are not in use here. There is no typing. I have never taken a typing class; I took a Keyboarding class. Thus I settle on “KIC”.
Except, as the case turns out, I am incorrect about the whole sordid mess.
The LaRouche comment came to the entry on “Scott’s Comment”, a post “Justice for Jeremiah” chose to post.
In the meantime, and I note this in the referrals, I have really only a couple of LaRouche questions at the end of the day.
#1: Why does Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, et al, possess any more power in the political sphere than LaRouche does? This thought popped into my mind anew when Pat Robertson’s dietary shake, and ability to leg-press one ton, came into the news. It’s… sort of the same money siphoning thingy.
#2: What will happen to the Larouche Mass Movement when Larouche dies? Scientology, for example, can go on past the life of L Ron Hubbard, ideas — such as they are — in check, the whole thing incorporated, someone else at CEO. But the nature of LaRouche suggests LaRouche needs to be running for the highestoffice every four years, to save mankind, to perpetuate itself — tiding over the four years with this crusade or that crusade, LaRouche keeping up with his writings and lectures. Are you going to annoit a new LaRouche? Or will the whole affair factionalize itself, each deciding on different “heirs” to Larouche, perhaps one deciding there can be no new Lyndon Larouche, and thus tiding their days in devotional prayer to the almighty? Maybe there will suddenly be a Larouchite Primary contest to decide who will be running for president every four years… diversity of opinion within the sphere of the now doctrine-giverless Larouchite brigade spilling over the whole group — just how do you double the square, and is it okay if I kind of like the early Beatles tunes?