ITEM NUMBER ONE:Â Ron Paul versus Lyndon Larouche, proxy election results
It is, I suppose, apples and oranges — though apples and oranges are similar enough to compare. All of Ron Paul’s endorsed candidates were statewide and not necessarily running on a program — frankly, it’s a little difficult to determine Ron Paul’s modus operation. The Nevada Independent gubernatorial candidate had a right win cause de jour behind him, New Jersey’s Senate candidate was a long time friend and associate (he ever write in one of Paul’s newsletters?), and I don’t know why he thought to endorse the Mississippi Republican Senate candidate and what separate Chris McDaniel from some other insurgent candidates.
The three Ron Paul selections
Ryan Bundy 1.4 percent 13,803
Chis McDaniel 16.4 percent 145,329
Murray Sabrin 0.7 percent 19,077
The three Lyndon Larouche candidates. I will note, that numbers aren’t from the official source — I see a couple different tabulations out there for slightest of slight shifts.
Al Green  DEM 89.1%  135,427
Phil Kurtz LIB  3.9% 5,898
Benjamin Hernandez IND  3.8% 5,740
Kesha Rogers IND  3.3% 5,005
Dusty Johnson REP  60.3% 202,673
Tim Bjorkman DEM  36% 121,002
 Ron Wieczorek IND  2.2% 7,322
George Hendrickson LIB  1.5% 4,912>
Debbie Dingell DEM 68.1% 198,582
Jeff Jones REP  28.9% 84,318
Gary Walkowicz WCP  2.3% 6,684
Niles Niemuth NPA  0.8% 2,198
Here there are apples and oranges yet again. Not surprisingly, the candidate that did the best — Jeff Jones — isn’t affiliated with the Larouchies, is of a political party in a nation where affiliation with one or the other party almost guarantees you come in first or second, but — for whatever reason — signed on with a statement of principles to get an “in” with a speaking arrangement before the group in Michigan.
The candidate who was the “national” focus for the org, Kesha Rogers, I can only suggest — what a slide it is for her. Once upon a time, her candidacies were nuisances to the Texas Democratic Party — two congressional nominations and a Senate run-off. Now, she’s totally irrelevant, though perhaps by design.
There is at least one more candidate floating out there — Jessica White of New York. For the Reform Party. 968 votes, or .5 percent. Of course, if we’re still comparing how the “Ron Paul Revolution” did compared with LarouchePac, Paul surely has inspired candidates throughout the nation who passed that .5 percent threshold.
ITEM NUMBER TWO
The logistical problem when a history of fingering a figure of the “Get Larouche Task Force”, who “put Larouche in prison”, runs right up against the political reality of a Republican administration they’re backing refurbishes him for a new era.
William Barr as Attorney General? Either a Guy To Take Down Mueller, or a Bush Plant? Time Will Tell.
It flutters online, and then… is removed… as the Larouchies move on to space wars to figure out what, really, is their line here.
ITEM NUMBER THREE
So goes Russian tv.
Helga Zepp-LaRouche, the founder of the Schiller Institute, headquartered in Washington, DC, told Sputnik that British intelligence agencies Ñould have been behind the alleged meddling in the 2016 US presidential elections. According to her, the team of then President Barack Obama and the UK’s MI6 could have worked together.
Naturally?
Evidence that seems to point to Russia conveniently fabricated, as is the way of the British…
November 23, the hacktivist group released documents related to this project and said that the program had been launched in 2015 and was funded by the UK government. The Integrity Initiative’s list of participants includes Bill Browder, the CEO of Hermitage Capital Management, and Vladimir Ashurkov, an associate of Russian opposition figure Alexei Navalny, according to Anonymous.
According to Zepp-LaRouche, some stolen documents may be not authentic, however, in general, the description is consistent with the nature of UK intelligence’s methods.
“It could be that some elements may be not authentic. However, the overall story is entirely consistent with the modus operandi of British intelligence operations, and it very well may turn out, that it is this network, which is deeply involved with ‘Russiagate’ and the entire coup against [US] President [Donald] Trump,” the politician said.
Noted, a shifting of authorities for Russia’s propaganda purposes: this is not the Lyndon Larouche Movement; it’s the Helga Zepp Larouche Movement.
Meantime, Kesha Rogers is a what now?
In the early morning hours of Dec. 8, China sent a spacecraft into Earth orbit that will make history early next year when it lands on the far side of the Moon. As spaceweather.com aptly acknowledged, “if the mission succeeds, it will catapult China into the forefront of lunar exploration with a landing that no other nation has even dared to attempt.†If there were ever a reason for the U.S. to change course and re-commit to the exploration of space, this is it.
This must be the “New Sputnik-Chang’e-4 Shock,†for the United States, said LaRouchePAC National Policy Committee leader Kesha Rogers, from Houston where she is an international spokeswoman for advancing space R&D. Rogers called today’s launch, “A wake-up call for the future … it is a unifying mission for the nation.â€
And So says Harley Schlanger to Russia tv. Lauding the Chinese Model… see too here. And… say this?
The Schiller Institute is a political and economic think tank founded in 1984 via the philosophies of political activist Lyndon LaRouche and German poet Friedrich Schiller.
Was Friedrich Schiller a devotee of the style of cut-up poetry later employed by William Burroughs?
All to be able to put this phrasing… Numerous Russian media published lengthy reports on Helga Zepp-LaRouche’s explosive comments to the press in the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation last week, in which she emphasized that it was the British that had interfered in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election and are engaged in “a planned coup†against President Donald Trump; that Trump wants to improve relations with Russia, and that the upcoming summit between Putin and Trump could “bring some amazing resultsâ€; and that cooperation among the leaders of Russia, the U.S., China and India could solve the systemic crisis and open a new era of technological advance for humanity.
And EIR pleas with Trump:
President Trump has got to understand the folly of placing any credit in the foolish arguments of the “China-bashers” in his administration and face the reality that China, with its capabilities and experience in the field of infrastructure, can become an asset rather than a liability for US economic revival. But then President Trump has to extend the hand of friendship and not the “cold shoulder” of new tariffs when he meets the Chinese leader next month.
“Tarriff Man”. (Odd, as they sure love China’s Dear Leader. Or are willing to schill for him.)
William Jones, Washington bureau chief of the Executive Intelligence Review news magazine, said ending poverty had long been regarded a major task for humanity but until recently, was seen as a Utopian dream.
“With China, that dream is now becoming a reality,” he said.
ITEM NUMBER FOUR
The legacy is that their causes bob and weave, cited decades later in the oddball “
rare species of exotic floral” studies. Improbable Research, as it fills a quota of daily material, skips back to the great c256 cause.
You probably also know that in the “LaRouchie†election droves of people of all races voted for a name they liked more than the other names without knowing a thing about the candidates.–
Huh. Wonder why that guy with the nice name “Drury†didn’t do better.
Maybe voters weren’t “hazy’ as to who he was.
ITEM NUMBER FIVE
Beethoven Choral Fantasy & Mass in C Major – St. Bartholomew’s Church.
ITEM NUMBER SIX:
Bill Nye, popular kids science show host of the 90s,
weighs in:
“This whole idea of terraforming Mars, as respectful as I can be, are you guys high?†the science educator asked in an interview with USA TODAY. “We can’t even take care of this planet where we live, and we’re perfectly suited for it, let alone another planet.â€
Will the Larouchies declare Bill Nye a British Agent? What say the International Spokeswomen for advancing space R & D Kesha Rogers? Is Bill Nye wrong?
ITEM NUMBER SEVEN
Upon his return from Russia, the cast of Trump characters expanded to include Roger Stone and Paul Manafort: “On July 24, 1987 … an article appeared in a highly unlikely venue, the ‘Executive Intelligence Review,’ that strongly suggested something mysterious was going on between him and the Kremlin. ‘The Soviets are reportedly looking a lot more kindly on a possible presidential bid by Donald Trump, the New York builder who has amassed a fortune through real-estate speculation and owns a controlling interest in the notorious, organized-crime linked Resorts International,’ the article said. ‘Trump took an all-expenses-paid jaunt to the Soviet Union in July to discuss building the Russians some luxury hotels.’
ITEM NUMBER EIGHT
Belated review of Operation Chaos… and, hm…My show went fine, but in July the LaRouchies escalated the attack by publishing a whole dossier on me. “In the early 1950s,” it claimed, “Paul Krassner was recruited to the stable of pornographers and ‘social satirists’ created and directed by the British Intelligence’s chief brainwashing facility, the Tavistock Institute, to deride and destroy laws and institutions of morality and human decency.” (For the record, I was never in England.)
Although LaRouche and I both taught at the Free University of New York in 1966, we didn’t cross paths. Even then, he had his devoted fans: One student there told me that “LaRouche presented the most credible, most articulate, and best-argued version of Marxist economics that I ever heard.” My own class was titled “Journalism and Satire and How to Tell the Difference.”
With all due respect to Paul Krassner… Who hasn’t been fingered into the vast “Get Larouche” conspiracy web?
I thought I remembered him passing away a few years ago. Can we work the “Mandela Effect” into his conspiracy theories somehow?
The Mandela Effect for Lyndon Larouche? Just as with Mandela and a false memory of his passing and the hooplah surrounding his death in the early 90s… for Larouche that would be — what? We falsely remember seeing in a NYT obituary that him dying sometime in the mid-90s, make a crack about the Queen of England, then … no hooplah whatsoever.
After decades of thinking about it, I realized LaRouche was mostly right about the British.
I went to college in the early 80’s – a long long way from home. Spent way too much time at O’Hare Airport remembering the LaRouchies (“More nukes less kooks”), the Moonies (“love bombing”), and the Hare Krishna all competing to see who could make life more unpleasant for those stuck at the airport waiting for flights out. Airplane! is still the best documentary of that era.
For a while there it wasn’t safe to walk through an airport. LaRouche fascisti and Hare Krishnas were everywhere hawking magazines and incense. Now that we have the Transport Sozialist Arbeiterpartei gropers instead, there’s room for a little nostalgia.
Fucking Boomers. I would rather have the CIA of the 1960s and 1970s than the Deep State that your generation created.
Most of you were never fighting for Liberty or freedom, just your brand of authoritarianism.
Just stop with the propaganda.
ITEM NUMBER NINE
NYT:Â As his activities grew more prominent in Europe, and he began funding drug reform efforts in the United States, he started being cast in the 1990s as a central figure in a shadowy Jewish cabal by extremist figures such as the fascist presidential candidate Lyndon H. LaRouche Jr. and allies of repressive Eastern European leaders who were targeted by groups funded by Mr. Soros.
The theories were initially confined to the anti-Semitic fringe, though Mr. Soros is not closely associated with Jewish or Israeli causes, and in fact has been accused of being anti-Israel and was criticized by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
THE CBC…
For what it’s worth, Soros is funding political causes worldwide. Controlling what — less than the Koch Bros, I suppose.
The strange thing about the origins of “
cultural marxism” is… I’ve read enough to see the basic idea from
that there right of the design of degenerating the culture as a Marxist plot precedes the “Frankfruit School” and the Larouchian denunciation of said.
So say Larouche:Â
The CBC is a Crown Corporation owned by “the Sovereign†of Canada, who is Queen Elizabeth, herself.
The cause of the focus on the story of “The Right’s attack on Soros” — not the threats against the man, mind you, but the Russian media appearances of Hegla Zepp alerting the news that it’s the British that Did It All, not the Russians.
ITEM NUMBER ELEVEN
Oddly the most viewed video out of the last dozen or so? A Jacques Cheminade video they put out a few days ago about a Mass Strike in France. In fact it’s been their most viewed video in a month or more.
Yellow Vest Protests. ‘Tis topical. Burrow into any civil unrest that’s out there… Still, this isn’t so much the Lyndon Larouche Movement as it is the Jacques Cheminade Movement.
Maybe in the US they’ll get far with this old new line…
 when contemplating the new “politico-duo†of Sen. Bernie Sanders and his sidekick, no-longer resident Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis. As they play out their media-promoted “plot†to create the “Progressive International†(PI), one quickly finds out that the real intent behind their play-acting routine is, in fact, not to help the poor and disadvantaged worldwide, as they claim, but rather to revive the pro-Nazi designs of Britain’s pre-eminent economic wizard, Lord John Maynard Keynes. Studying the interactions between the two, one cannot help but wonder: have Abbott and Costello, or perhaps a new version of the Marx Brothers, suddenly reincarnated themselves, this time with the evil intention of using the cloak of the “entirely absurd†to finally drive you, me and the rest of humanity, quickly, into a terrible New Dark Age?
Keynes. What was his role with the original Bretton Woods?
