Maybe you or your family have owned some combination of dogs and cats?  After about my sixth grade of school, our family had as many as — oh, 11, cats, and as many as 2 dogs.  That’s two liters, 7 cats which were pretty shortly taken to inevitable slaughter but hopeful adoption, 1 cat given away, and then cat number 9 killed by a vet performing a neutering operation.  They gave us peanut brittle to apologize for killing the cat.

One of the dogs was run over by a car, which left us with 2 cats and a dog — on through high school graduation.  They initially had to be separated — dog reacts furiously to petrified cats.  It is a curious lesson in their path to detente.  I suppose a licensed dog obedience trainer can give the low down on how this outcome is achieved, but we muddled through to its conclusion where they could live with each other.  At first the cat reacts to the dog by running off to a corner.  But the cat quickly learns that the way to get rid of the dog and have her brought back outside is to provoke it — straddle next to the dog (hair standing on end, tail up, a bit gingerly.)

Reaction on how to handle the dog’s barking frenzy and cat’s provocation becomes contradictory.  You want to send the message to the dog that barking at the cat will have it put outside, and you want to send the message to the cat that provoking the dog will not lead the dog to be put outside.  The thing ends, though, with the dog able to keep its control, not provoked by the cat, and the cat giving up on its attempts to get the dog to respond.  And it ends even further years later with the dog and cat growing old and lethargic and lacking the energy to fight.

I don’t know.  I thought about the cat and dog in concern with Pastor Terry Jones burning a Koran, resulting in a deadly protest in Afghanistan.  I suppose the latest protest is better in keeping — though the message of the sign misses the mark of the proper reaction of miffed eye roll.  (I suppose they’re apt to draw a conclusion between Jones and this, where Jones is just an annoying guy to us.) “If only religion were the opiate of the people. Instead, religion is the goddamned PCP + crystal meth + ‘roid rage of the people.”

I suppose you want to hear Alex Jones talk about Glenn Beck?

… before he brings on the show… um… ????  Are you kidding me???

Yes.  It’s a Beck — Jones — La Rouche — Icke Festival!

It gets boring pretty quickly.

I think Jones has had pretty good need for Beck, or at least pretty good use for Beck.  Somewhat similar to the theory that Beck’s inclusion in the Fox News line-up has brought the rest of the line-up to be looked at as more centered by comparison.  And I have never believe Jones in his assertions of how limited his “monitoring” of Beck has been.

But it gets funny to see a Beck head and a Jones-head …

Soros and Alex came out to get Beck and they have succeded. Now who will team up with Soros to get Alex. “They came for me and no one helped.” When they come for you no one will help either. Maybe this is the reason you hardley ever hear Alex mention Soros. It appears Alex sided with Media Matters, Huffinggton Post and other Soros organizations.

Partyof1, obviously you don’t listen to the show very often.
Alex talked the other day about this rumor and gave the stats. Beck has actually gained channels over the last year so Jones’ discussions have not cost Beck anything.
In addition, Alex has never been as malicious with regard to Beck and, if fact, expressed his sympathy for Becks schilled out soul.
It is apparent that he is making a false seperation from Fox to push a globalist agenda. It even states in their “seperation” that he will continue to work with them.
Beck waters the truth down and then reconstitutes it with globalist half-truths and outright lies.
Maybe him and Boehner can get together and cry for the TV sometime.
Boehner said today that he was going to work on a budget with the rest of the congress and “get as many concession as they would give”. Give me a friggin’ break… as many as they would give… as many as they would give… (“Playoffs!”) what the hell… they won’t give any if they don’t have to, f’in’ f’ers.

And.

Jones, YOU are indeed the secret globalist distraction. How do you reconcile that A. Beck is a fake.
B. FOX is part of NWO, and C. FOX gets rid of Beck?
You, Alex’s Clones parrot everything your leader tells you. Can you not think for yourselves? Despite Alex’s endless boasting Beck has opened more eyes than he ever will.
How do you reconcile: A. Libya is a bizarre and inexplicable war, except if seen as the precedent for the Responsibility To Protect Doctrine (of Samantha Power wife of Sunnstein, and funded by Soros).
B. The Leftist/Muslim Coalition putting together the 2nd Flotilla to Gaza as the rocket attacks from Gaza intensify. C. All will coincide with Israel’s necessary defensive attacks upon the source of rocket attacks and blockade of the Flotilla (or even a false flag attack on the Flotilla) and then VOILA the Soros/Leftist/Islamic created “Responsibility To Protect” will attack Israel and establish a No-Fly-Zone at least over Gaza. THEN, WHO IS THE ENEMY? Will the anti-Semites amongst you here, (many) find a way to justify the New World Order’s attack on Israel? Is your Jew hatred greater than your NWO hatred? I wonder.

This article must have been written by the Huffingtin Post or Soros. It proves what Glenn has been saying. “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” Alex has teamed up with Huffington Post and Soros to discredit Glenn because of his jealousy of Glenns success. He is using the same team up against Limbaugh. Alex actually doesn’t know what goes on Glenns show since he doesn’t have time to watch but relys on what Huffpo says about Glenn and puts it out on his show and all you dumb listeners who don’t watch either bedleive it.

They’ll run off onto two different tracks.  One of these days, Beck may even bring on Jones and vice versa. (This is Establishment Propaganda, right?)

Good news.  Paul Ryan has in his hand “The Path to Prosperity”.
We just need to follow it and we’ll have prosperity. 
There oughta be a law that requires politicians’ documents have generic and un-appetizing names.

Kind of like Australia’s cigarette packaging.

Reading the tea-leaves of Presidential and other political Contest 2012:

A day after JoAnne Kloppenburg declared victory, Winnebago County has reported new numbers that give a new 40-vote edge to David Prosser. That’s 40 votes out of close to 1.5 million votes.

In context, the last election went like this:

I want to know who those scattered candidates were in 2001.
 Or I probably don’t.

The discovery of enough votes to put Prosser over the top has quelled the chomping at the bit from various conservative blogs and commentators about voting fraud.  And it’s become siren

It’s been noted by everyone the sheer dullness of Obama’s 2012 kick-off video.  The people bounce about, relating their tepid support for Obama.  It figures, though I’ve never really known what there was for people to be “disappointed” (or all that disappointed)… we talk about elections in the most surreal way.  Things were given away with the whole “Campaign in poetry, govern in prose” line — which always struck me as meaning –???  Well, Obama’s no Pawlenty, I guess.

He does need a strong performance by the Senate candidate in Virginia in order to win what proved to be his pivotal state in 2008.  That’s why he worked to get Tim Kaine in the race.  And he has this working for him.

George Allen is not going to win his Senate election.

NBC 4’s reporter-anchor Craig Melvin is a tall African-American. Which apparently led to this exchange with former Sen. George Allen, according to Melvin’s Twitter account Tuesday night:

“For the 2nd time in 5 months, fmr. gov. and sen candidate George Allen asks me,”what position did you play?” I did not a play a sport.”

I like Allen’s twitter reponse. 

sorry if I offended, ask people a lot if they played sports Grew up in fball family found sports banter good way to connect”

Sure.

Somebody sets up a sign and throws a shin-dig every Sunday at 1:30 in the middle of the Park Blocks.  It’s a typical Christian gambit.  The sign says Communion is taking place.  I walked along, wondering thy there were several (decently dressed) men standing there, spied and read the sign — which prompted the head of this religious clique to wave in as a means to beckon the obvious curiosity-seeker that I was.  I shook my head and walked along.  I had a couple problems with them to work out — first to move in a different definition of Communion, instead of my Catholic assumption on hearing the word as Eurcharist — and secondly — I couldn’t square the conversation I overheard from them.  They were talking about the dire need for a Balanced Budget, — indeed I thought I had stumbled upon a group of evangelical Republicans or evangelical Libertarians (evangelical in the lower case adjective sense).

Moving downtown, I saw that some activists had plastered some chalk writing on the sidewalk in front of some banks– and in some cases taped crap on the building itself.  They were protesting environmentally unsound banking practices in terms of who they invest with and lend to — what interested me about this was to see that the chalk writing stopped at bank’s edge, such that it was clear the activists had no beef with — for instance — Rite Aid — where the messy chalk writing stopped at store’s edge, and all was clear in front of Rite Aid.

Point:  Kinetic military action–definitely sounds like they’re running out of phrase substitutes for “war”.  I bet Earth would be a much more enjoyable planet if the Prime Directive were observed more closely.

Counterpoint:  If the Star Ship Enterprise had followed the Prime Directive, there’d be a lot fewer enjoyable episodes of Star Trek.

Obama mocks his Nobel Prize:  President Obama took a brief moment during an ambitious speech about energy on Wednesday to simultaneously praise a colleague and drop a bit of self-deprecating humor about his Nobel Peace Prize.

“[Energy Secretary Steven] Chu’s the right guy to do this, he’s got a Nobel prize in physics — he actually deserved his Nobel prize,” Obama said, drawing laughter with his offhanded remark on the otherwise serious topic of improving the safety of natural gas extraction.

Har de har har.

You know, as much as I appreciate this self-deprecating joke to the most surreal moment of the early Obama Administration (What were those Norwegians thinking?), I would have appreciated far more had Obama declined his Nobel Prize — and there is precedent for that — considering his Noble Prize acceptance speech included this deep thought on his road ahead:

“Some will kill. Some will be killed.”

— Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but the Prize clashes with his job description as he understands it.

STORY NUMBER ONE:  OLIVER STONE’S SORT OF FAMOUS SON BRINGS TOGETHER HISTORIC MEETING BETWEEN THE LYNDON LAROUCHE MOVEMENT AND ALEX JONES

But… But… But…

If you listen to LaRouche you will understand “Who is the Enemy”, and what is the solution to the control of our nation. Jones just likes to scare people and make it seem as if the enemy is all powerful. He is full of shit. …

Certainly a red-letter day in the recent history of this org.  It’s a match up that the public has been begging for, and believing probable.  See here:  Hey Alex, very good points. I’m an Argentinean and they run the same experiment in my country 10-15 years ago. We definitely know all of this by heart guys… It’s VERY real. They took our pension funds, invested them, crashed them. All the time selling it as it was a great thing.
I’ve been following you for the last 6 years, and I keep wondering why you don’t join forces with the Larouche gang: Just asking.

It’s The question David Icke forum participants wondered some time ago.
And our dear friend, Cliff Kincaid, comes closer to the truth — and Tom DeWeese.
And Webster Tarpley and his confessed “break away”, and previous intimations from Jones and articles on his website that the Oligarchy is using the Larouche Cult as a boogey man to side-step 9/11 Truth and Malthusian plots goes by the way-side.  As does the phrase “Credulous populist media“, and the warning to the org not to trust this sector of information (even while posting to the comments sections on “Webcast Day”s).

Jeff Steinberg, already a staple on Iranian Press TV, pops up on Alex Jones, and is followed by Hollywood Celebrity, Sean Stone, son of Oliver Stone, and if you listen to Jones’s clip, you will see Jones state that Stone is the one who suggested he bring on Jeff Steinberg,  (Did Sean Stone drug up with Charlie Sheen sometime recently?)

Does anybody want to know what Sean Stone’s view on what’s happening is, really?  (Apparently more people than want to know Jeff Steinberg’s views on things.)  Solar Spot activities intensifying, electromagnetic waves, the Giant Moon — 100 percent that’s what did it –and the issue of the “End Game and End Times converging” as the Mayans suggested, all not hidden about the Masons particularly interested in the Book of Revelations… Ancient Egyptians and Mayans and Sumerans understood all this better and…

Now I understand Larouche’s current issue … it’s a means of getting traction with a contingency of nutty b level Hollywood celebrity figures — all of um have money.   And it is a strange clash from this:

Ok you guys. Honestly I love you guys and believe in what you stand for. I know that is important to advance your technology for the greater good. By making these video’s people start to think that you guys are a little cooky. I personally love you guys but right now your prime focus should be on the issues at hand, and preventing the New World Order from consuming your country and putting us into the next dark age. You are not going to win the fight by posting this stuff.

I think it’s far more kooky to watch pro sports, worship celebrities, watch tv, and post vacuous comments on Facebook than it is to talk like this. This is real and this is what actually matters, not your gossip, fashiow show, snob culture.

@procack1 You are thinking with a fear mindset. This video present brilliant visions for mankind. Anybody who thinks they are ‘cooky’ isn’t watching their videos anyways, so they are irrelevant. (har de har)  LPAC members are presenting literally the best logical realistic solution for the major world problems. The visions that they offer are going to be what will save mankind and put us in a new Golden Age, we must think long term, centuries ahead, to regain our optimism and love of our God given genius.

Or, in Stone’s case… Hollywood nepotism? Hm.

the deceivers are going to come out of the woodwork and they will appear to be on our side and use alternative media to push their agenda
we have to be EXTRA vigilant right now

That dude is on that cocaine son! He couldn’t form a coherent thought. It looked like Alex knew something was off. He got a little uncomfortable and didn’t let the guy speak too long.
Oh I was talking about Steinberg by the way. Sean Stone was right on the money. Levitation what!
wtf is this guy talking about? Ghosts and demons..what a bunch of bullshit. I hope AJ isn’t becoming Coast to Coast AM.

Next up for Mr. Jones — “The Office of Net Assessment “.  Right?
Anyway… Kremlinology time… Steinberg does Jones.  Schlanger does Cleagel again.  So who references Steinberg and who references Schlanger out there?
Larouche next week.  The merger… is coming fast and furiously.

Only last night I came across this…
A discussion on the existential crisis of our civilisation.
“The Rim of Fire, the Mass Strike, and the Crisis of Civilization.” Hosted by Harley Schlanger.
Many out there, like Revolution Harry, are pretty well convinced this denouement has been planned for centuries.
Looks to me they are one and the same.  Take you pick.

Shields in California and Kesha Rogers in Texas, have escalated their campaigns on campuses in the two states, to mobilize them to join us in implementing the LaRouche Plan, to address the intersecting galactic and financial crises.  There is a new degree of openness among students — and faculty members, including especially those in the sciences — as it has become clear to them that merely squawking against budget cuts will not bring about a solution. The new urgency for action, from the galactic crisis, is striking a raw nerve, as they are coming to realize that their future now depends on them taking action, as they can no longer rely on an older generation, the Boomers, to act for the future.
More on that later.

To Protect Our Nation From the Galaxy’s Challenge to Our Existence, Obama Must Be Removed From Office.
March 30, 2011 (EIRNS)—”The existence of humanity is being challenged,” stated Lyndon LaRouche in his opening statement on the Lyndon LaRouche PAC (LPAC) …
In a later period of the discussion, LaRouche PAC Basement team leader Sky Shields detailed, with graphic representation, some of the leading satellite technologies which Obama has taken down, and which have otherwise been taken out of service for lack of a U.S. or European commitment. While done in the name of “saving money,” Shields said, these takedowns can only be understood as intentional moves toward implementing Obama’s British master’s drive for genocide.

It’s what’s got Sean Stone excited, and that’s all that matters, this game of “Galaxy Quest”.

LaRouche democrat Diane Sare reports from the the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant, exposing the anti-nuclear, genocidal agenda of Barack Obama and his New Jersey co-thinker, Gov. Chris Christie.  Yeah, if Jones can meet with Steinberg, why not?

Satan’s Fake Apocolypse chimes in here.   Check this out — it’s hilarious!  First we start with this story:   KABUL — Violent protests over the burning of a Koran spread to the heart of Taliban country Saturday, as clashes between demonstrators and Afghan police in Kandahar left at least nine people dead and more than 90 injured, according to Afghan officials.
And his response:

The only solution to this is Glass-Steagal,
Cures rashes too!  This guy’s funny.

On the contrary, I suspect that this crisis was planned long ago in order to provide the oligarchy with “undeniable evidence” that nuclear power is inherently dangerous.

Howie G chimes in here.  To tell the truth, from that perspective, I don’t think Obama would be noticed at all.

STORY NUMBER THREE —   THEY LOVE THEM IN SAN FRANCISCO!!!:  

What is interesting is that this gets a bit of a contrast with what the LPAC is publishing on the SAME EVENT.

Obama, explained a young woman with tidy braids, was failing to protect us from imminent earthquakes by not preparing us with the needed “infrastructure.” And this, she said, was despite repeated warnings from the Russians that an earthquake is on its way.
“We’re shutting down programs to send manned satellites into space,” explained her male compatriot.
The satellites, he said, could help us predict earthquakes, which was ever more important, “after what happened in Japan.”
Obama, he continued, is “destroying what makes the human species unique from all other forms of life,” and “condemning the human species” by failing to adequately prepare California, and the United States, for a large earthquake.
Building up steam, he said, Obama was failing to invest in research that would shed light on how the solar activity relates to tectonic activity.
“We know there’s a correlation, but we don’t know what,” he said
The LaRouchies claimed—and still do—that we’re in for another Ice Age. But go ahead.
“Everyone has been really nice so far,” he said cheerfully. “Even people within the city.”
Which makes sense when you think about it. San Francisco has adopted Frank Chu as its unofficial mascot, made the World Famous Bushman a tourist attraction, and bemusedly watches local nudists Lloyd and Rusty strut their stuff through the Castro.

Yeah, well…  In what may be the greatest touché in history, my Democratic sister just sent me this video in response to the one I posted earlier of Lyndon LaRouche.  It is of an, um, passionate Republican candidate for local treasurer in Stark County, OH speaking at a forum (needless to say he was less than victorious.)  I am rendered speechless.  Please tell me it was an April Fools’ Joke.

Ron Paul! Because the Democrats had Lyndon LaRouche first…

I should have been a tad more verbose in my reactions. It’s been pretty well established that LaRouche is a complete whackjob, but I’d be VERY reluctant to paste that tag on Ron Paul.

Pat Buchanan is just an older less gay version of Glenn Greenwald. They used to work together and both share a fringe LaRouche affinity. I think the word “Larouche” is being used as an adjective here, and not referencing the man himself.

I love this one.  In reference to the “Boldness” of a Senate Freshman.

Matt, you could say the same thing about a screed published by Lyndon LaRouche. The guy may be bold, but you don’t want him in government. The last thing we need is a George Bush “Freedom Agenda” protege seeking to convert the great

I think this is a mistake.

The Rockewell Libertarians put Hilter mustaches on everyone. (Looking at the Left has all pictures)

I’m certainly no fan of Lyndon LaRouche or the idiotic comparisons of Obama and hitler, but if this crowd had risen up and killed these security guards and cops, and I was on the jury for their murder trial, I wouldn’t have voted to convict. Good news for the Alaska activist, I guess.

Once again, the faithful followers of Lyndon Larouche were present to tout their program of impeachment, restoration of the Glass-Steagall Act, and massive reindustrialization, including a huge expansion in nuclear power — just a hair out of touch, you reckon? That’s the meaning of the “Smash the Solar Panels” slogan above.

They love ’em in East Bay!

Not only was this toddler upset, but numerous pedestrians enjoying a sunny spring day on Park Street and Central Avenue in Alameda were angered […] Police were summoned after a woman tossed her frozen drink on the the controversial photo illustration of Obama.

STORY NUMBER FOUR:  WHY DON’T THE WIKIPEDIANS EVER ASK THAT QUESTION ABOUT HATS?

Quick David Goldman update before we proceed: Will Beback more or less converted the Goldman article back, and the isp # which floated in amongst the referenced David Goldman identity changed it all back.  This is going places!

The neat thing about Slim Virgin’s failed attempt to put Jeremiah Duggan into the main article is that amongst the ordinary run of the mill Wikipedians saying “no”, we also got some Larouchians out of the woodwork.  As in, an editor who has quit editing, announced loudly, but came back Just for this purpose (probably from Wikipedia Review) and to give this passive aggressive note in editing, than having it reverted, the Jeremiah Duggan deletion at “Larouche Movement”:

I prefer to remove unfounded accusations, you prefer to add them back. I’m moving on, as I don’t obsess over LaRouche.

Also noted, a neat little isp # who has never edited anything but Larouche articles, and made a somewhat random attack of James Wales.
And chimes in complaining about how the article handles the “Party Line” issue:”

This wiki article sums up an unproven, slanderous, biased and highly personal opinion “by “he” I mean all LaRouche followers; internal dissent is not a big number with them” into the sentence “LaRouche’s views are the party line of the LaRouche movement.” This is first, Kaul’s own opinion (I doubt he seriously checked it) and can by no means be summed up the way it is done here, it is too weak for this purpose. I don’t know why you are constantly coming up with the WLYM article, which by the way just uses bare facts and which you did not even link properly. 😉

“Other Choices” believes that “this material deals with allegations of typical behavior from the 1970s and 1980s, and gives the misleading impression that this old stuff is representative of current practice.”  Huh.

To a question posed about how to handle the articles, and the “big one” — to what degree are Lyndon Larouche and the Lyndon Larouche inseparable, I can suggest one interesting item of note.

The Jewish 22-year-old had become mixed up with a right wing group called La Rouche before he died.
But Mrs Duggan claims despite collating new evidence from eyewitnesses who claim to have seen Jeremiah being attacked before he died, the German authorities refuse to do anything about it.

JN466 has become fond with using Scott McLemee’s little piece about Larouche for reference in the wikipedia section.  This presents the promise of, puzzlingly enough, having a section in the wikipedia articles devoted to the book “Dialectical Economics”, since this makes for two references of some notability.  (Sigh).

In figuring out how to attack the “Verdi Initiative”, SilverSeren chimes in on:
Actually there’s no point in comparing the Verdi Initiative and Duggan.  The former is something that Larouche was personally involved in and has been a major part of his life.  The latter is an event that brought large amount of criticism to his movement, but really didn’t affect his personal life at all, which is why it should be covered in the movement article.

Actually half of the Larouche articles have no business existing.

To this WIll Beback statement, So he spoke about it in his TV commercials. He also used those expensive platforms to address a number of other initiatives (including the colonization of Mars), to declare that Carter intended to initiate thermonuclear war of reelected, and to declare that Walter Mondale was an agent of Soviet influence. I’m not saying that it’s inconsequential or shouldn’t be included somewhere in the encyclopedia. I’m just saying that it in the scope of this biography it’s a minor initiative. I’ve proposed before that we cover all his minor initiatives, like the Verdi tuning and the Mars colonization, in a single paragraph.

comes Silverseren with:  In English, this means “I’m so glad that you’re willing to allow space for more of the crazy things LaRouche has supported and more remarks that make him look like a nutcase.” I think that’s a pretty good translation. We don’t care about WP:BLP here, let’s find all of the most horrible things about LaRouche that we can, are you with me? :D :D 😀 (/sarcasm…but only that last sentence.

If you deem those “crazy things” that’s your business.

It is true that sometimes we seem to go out of our way to make him look kooky. Part of the problem here is a temptation to seize upon good one-liners in press sources rather than available books that present his ideas in context. Where more deeply researched analysis is available, we should use it. —JN466 21:36, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

LaRouche’s attacks on Carter were not just off-hand one-liners: they were the basis for two of his presidential campaigns.   Will Beback talk 02:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
In many cases, I think reporters were simply mystified. For example, I came across one article from 1981 about LaRouche’s surprising defense of a liberal congressman, Harrison A. Williams, caught selling influence in the Abscam sting. Criticizing the investigation and doubting that the Senate would have enough moral courage to exonerate Williams, LaRouche is quoted as writing
There are members of Congress on both sides of the aisle so degenerate or so swayed by political opportunism that they variously promote or condone policies more hideous in their consequences than those perpetrated by Albert Speer and others under Adolf Hitler.
That’s an odd thing to for someone defending a Senator accused of bribery to write. I guess LaRouche’s point may have been that mere bribery is mild compared to the indescribable, unnamed atrocities condoned by other congressmen.   Will Beback talk 08:10, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

The most amusing debate that popped up over the past couple weeks concerned images of Plato and Aristotle for use.  JN466 wants one image in as “it does a good job of illustrating the Plato / Aristotle debate that Larouche references so much” and “the point is that this image illustrates the precise philosophical debate that Larouche makes so much of — Aristotle pointing at the ground; Plato pointing the sky.”
This is part of JN466’s overall project in arguing to the neoplatonist philosophy, which is the “intellectual foundation of his movement, is not even mentioned in the Views article at present, despite the fact that the 24 page chapter on Larouche in George Johnson’s” [book] covers it.

Apparently the AIDS crisis was a (gasp) British plot?  LaRouche has alluded ambiguously to this before in his conspiracy theories, but in this video it becomes shockingly explicit: http://www.larouchepac.com/node/17802

In the end:  “The group itself refers to its methods of harrassment and denunciation as a ‘psywar technique’ and defends them as necessary to shake people up’ Johnson has written that believing the general population to be hopelessly indoctrinated by the mass media, they “fight back with words that stick in one’s mind like shards of glass.”  “Why be nice?  We’re in a war and the human race is up for grabs.”
… An info-war, if you will…

No one bit of Slim Virgin’s suggestion to emphasize the Larouchian attitude on the “British”, except a “Gonfaloniate”, who sums everything up well enough:  “I figured I’d stop by and mention that for those who are only peripherally aware of Larouche’s existence (like myself), bringing his name up in conversation will probably elicit, ‘Oh, that guy from the 70s and 80s who thinks everything is a British conspiracy?”

STORY NUMBER FIVE: THE GREAT DEBATE CONTINUES!!!

Observing a rash οf Anti-Zionist news. Arе thе core issues really being challenged? Iѕ thе Anti-Zionism јυѕt a cover οr a distraction? Iѕ Zionism a symptom, аnd аrе thе produce(s) being ignored?

Thеrе wіll bе nο jewish revolution even though thеrе аrе many whο аrе disgruntled.

1776Matthew If I …
@1776Matthew If I could convince you to read one thing by LaRouche, look for a 1978 “Campaigner” article called “The Secrets Renowned Only to the Inner Elites,” (free pdf online) which goes into splendid point about how Judaism was one of many “polymorphous” cults made in ancient Babylon. It has lasted so long by being (by all accounts) monotheistic. But you can find Judaic principles in many other cults and religions.

@deadeyedick1933 I don’t completely trust LaRouche. He puts out some excellent info from time to time, but it is certainly to be taken with a grain of salt.

CIA, SAS, Wal-Mart… Sure, there are some shabbos goys involved in all this. But all these “intelligence agencies” and “secret societies” have their roots in jewish subversion. The judaic nature of Freemasonry is well documented. The whole global “zeitgeist” is judaic. Usury, fraud, deception, aggression, decadence….

…………………….

Yeah, well… this seems to float in as well…

Here I am, deep in Power Elite territory. I cannot give out personal information, details as to people, places, or activities. That would be my death knell and a step back for World Peace. Not that I am a key player or anything, but I am sure it is comforting to find out a little news can come from the opposing front lines every once in a while.

I contacted Doctor Sternum a little while ago. I used a hacker program from one of my Newby Power Elite friends from my boarding school days that I trust implicitly.

I modified an existing message in his inbox on February 17, 2011: “Dear Doctor Sternum. I am Agent Power Elite. I am on the inside. They are now scrambling. Watch!”
In other items:

This is not a “controversial case” by any real definition.
They remember it! March 27, 1986… a red letter day in the history of WORLD CIVILIZATION.
The Larouchies tie the two cases together too.  Though not so much thematically as the case is here.

Bob Dreyfuss… again and again.

ENOUGH!
While neoconservatism and the literal fascists may be travelling different roads, their ultimate destination (as determined by their common root premise) is the same.  All that differs is the scenery — and as the destination is approached, not even that.  (That, by the way, is why the arguments over whether such as Jared Loughner  or the Texas IRS plane crasher were “left” or “right” wing, are such a joke; the “scenery” of their writings would have been unremarkable in any of the following: Free Republic, Democratic Underground, the commenters at Zero Hedge, or the groupies of Lyndon Larouche and Ron Paul.)

But good for:

Meg Whitman’s failed bid for California governor hilariously sucked $178.5 million out of her wallet, but a Trump presidential spending spree would be funnier than Lyndon LaRouche’s diary.
Ron Paul is a meepbag in the mold of Lyndon Larouche. Some of what he says sounds legit, but mostly he’s a hole.
I think “LaRouche” is French for Fruit Loop.
I think Paultards are disenfranchised LaRouchies.
Most people aren’t stockpiling gold or seeds. Gold often appeals to older people whose parents drilled the lessons of the Great Depression into their heads. The only person I know personally who is planting his own garden “just in case” is a big Larouche guy, not a conservative.

George Shollenberger seems to have Seasame Street in his mind here.

The other form of dark energy is presented by theological scientists who believe in God. The ‘Big Thinkers’ on this dark matter are theologian scientists such as Abraham, Moses, Anaxagoras, Plato, Aristotle, Jesus Christ, Anselm, Nicholas of Cusa, Johannes Kepler, Galileo, Gottfried Leibniz, Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupetuis, Ben Franklin, Bernhard Riemann, Georg Cantor, Ernst Cassirer, Suzanne Langer, Kenneth Burke, and Lyndon LaRouche.

Hey…  You lose me at this sentence:

Frank’s somewhat humorous response to the woman was perhaps not politically savvy, because in general politicians should not appear frustrated in public; moreover, the video ended up circulating on the Intertubes for months (an important issue for public speakers that we’ll take up later in the book).

Savvy enough.

Thought of the day …

Skipping past a Bill O’Reilly “Talking Points” segment, and passing by the use of the phrase “Now, Talking Points Memos believes that…”

… O’reilly leads off with a poll.

A new Pew poll out Tuesday says more Americans support the Libyan action than oppose: 47 percent for it; 36 percent against.

The numbers float there without any context.  That’s not really that good numbers a picture for Obama — it’s in this gray zone of “Approval / Disapproval” for the psychology of “military intervention approval” and all baggage that comes with that, shows a number more or less ready to jump on board and off board , and this shows with his low approval rating.
Or so goes my explanation analysis.  Or, better to say “Skull / Bones holds that –”

It’s a little annoying for a pundit to just throw out poll numbers.  But what I’m struck by is this phrase.

But no matter what side you’re on, the fog coming from the far left is simply staggering.

“The Far Left”.  Who is the “Far Left”?  Apparently Representative Anthony Weiner.  AND, of course…

And then there’s MSNBC, the uber-liberal anti-war network. Not anymore. Listen to this comparison of Obama and Bush.

On to clip of Rachel Maddow.

Within the framework of American politics, if someone throws out the phrase “far left” “Ultra- liberal anti-war”, I’d think… Code Pink, perhaps.   Normon Solomon?  But if we define a congress-man from New York as “Far Left”, I want to know — who can O’Reilly pass off with “Left” and “liberal” without the adjectives “Far” and “Ultra”?