Archive for January, 2010

Things that are stupid

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010
Things that are stupid.
This video.
I do not understand the message.  Who out there thought they were electing a Democratic Party to implement Libertarian policy prescriptions, and to somehow manuever around the somewhat shifting lines of paranoia of the “Tea=Party Movement”.  I don’t think the creators of the youtube video voted for Obama.  (I also find the allegations in the comments about a youtube- Obama suppression of this “hot” “Viral” video amusing, and — in a round about way — reinforcing my doubts.)
It is a game of political narcissim, which holds that a politician’s route to election is to follow through on your politics.  This is also shown when someone “makes a sudden” partisan or ideological transformation.  I was at a prominent book store of this city the other day, and looked at the back cover of this book.  It is one more in the giant ocean of these debris — the back cover blurb list is interesting — I guess Phil Hendrie’s sort of “familiar to my conversion” is the one that sticks out from the line of conservative bloggers and talk show hosts.  Look over his list, though, and you see … um… Ward Churchill, some intemperate politicians, and…
*Bill Clinton robbed children all over the world of their innocence with his tawdry Monica Lewinsky escapades and taught them how to perjure themselves under oath . . . while Hillary Clinton tacitly endorsed the whole sordid affair.
To each their own.  There was a counterveiling effect of somewhat amiable to the Republicans in one way or the other outraged by the exploitation and airing of the scandal in the first place.  The next one is a bit more the case for that:
Terry Schiavo starved to death because liberal judges refused to acknowledge her basic right to life.
Now, I’m all for Political Idiosyncracies, but I gather this one as much the case of forging new opinions with your new political cohorts ala “Movement”.   Ward Churchill at least is wildly unpopular.  If we take things to be a continuum that has two sides and two sides only and define everyone as here or there, he just went from the side with the minority position to the majority position with Churchill.  For Terri Schiavo, Here he schlepped from the majority position to the minority position.

Uganda and one of those three evangelicals

Monday, January 4th, 2010

A few more details on American Evangelicals’ influence in shaping Uganda’s anti-gay bill have come out, or better to say some connections have been made.

For three days, according to participants and audio recordings, thousands of Ugandans, including police officers, teachers and national politicians, listened raptly to the Americans, who were presented as experts on homosexuality. The visitors discussed how to make gay people straight, how gay men often sodomized teenage boys and how “the gay movement is an evil institution” whose goal is “to defeat the marriage-based society and replace it with a culture of sexual promiscuity.”

Now the three Americans are finding themselves on the defensive, saying they had no intention of helping stoke the kind of anger that could lead to what came next: a bill to impose a death sentence for homosexual behavior.

I have a small verdict to make here.  I don’t know if the “Exodus” man is being truthful or not…

“I feel duped,” Mr. Schmierer said, arguing that he had been invited to speak on “parenting skills” for families with gay children. He acknowledged telling audiences how homosexuals could be converted into heterosexuals, but he said he had no idea some Ugandans were contemplating the death penalty for homosexuality.

“That’s horrible, absolutely horrible,” he said. “Some of the nicest people I have ever met are gay people.”

Shocked, I’m sure, that his compassionate “Gays can become Straight” message is part of a further program toward a Death Penalty.  Perhaps, but I do know the name of this next fellow, and I know he is lying.

Mr. Lively and Mr. Brundidge have made similar remarks in interviews or statements issued by their organizations. But the Ugandan organizers of the conference admit helping draft the bill, and Mr. Lively has acknowledged meeting with Ugandan lawmakers to discuss it. He even wrote on his blog in March that someone had likened their campaign to “a nuclear bomb against the gay agenda in Uganda.” Later, when confronted with criticism, Mr. Lively said he was very disappointed that the legislation was so harsh.

Scott Lively.  By now The “Oregon Citizens Alliance” has been shoved aside for a friendlier “pro Marriage” front of less strident bigotry.  But I recognize the name Scott Lively as the author of a book claiming the German Nazi Party as part of the Homosexual Agenda.

He was a man with a plan.

The “Decade” has ended, and Americans are or are not optimistic

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

Right Said Fred’s “I’m Too Sexy for My Shirt” is to the 1990s what Kelis’s “My Milkshake Brings All The Boys to the Yard” is to the “Oughts”.  Every decade brings itself this basic trope in pop culture.  I am not sure what the equivalent song is for the 1980s — maybe Frankie Goes to Hollywood’s “Relax”, but that song is a bit too more overt in its suggestions.

And so with that I exhaust my thoughts on the previous decade’s popular culture debris.

It is interesting to note a contradictory polling result.  Americans believe that this next year will be be better than the last, and they also believe the nation is heading in the wrong direction.  It’s a symptom of rather loosely defined framing, I suppose.

Strikingly, people who otherwise don’t fall for the decade-trope are giddily accepting it, thinking they can mentally cut off “The Decade from Hell”.  It’s a curious enough contruct.  Woe to the Sports Franchise who wins a bunch of Championships, but wins them straddling the end of one decade and the beginning of the next — for the “Team of the Decade” moniker will go to that team that wins multiple championships in the proper ten year span.  The Los Angeles Lakers are the Team of teh Oughts, for they won four champions to the Spurs’ three champions in the years 2000-2009.  But, the Spurs won 4 against the Lakers’ 3 in the years between 1999 and 2008.  Dagnabit, the Spurs suck.