Rachel Brown To Take On Bailout Barney Frank
November 14, 2009 Boston, MA (LPAC) — LaRouche Youth Movement activist Rachel Brown announced today that she is a candidate for the Democratic nomination to U.S. Congress in the 4th District in Massachusetts, for the seat presently occupied by Bailout Barney Frank. Brown told a national internet audience on The LaRouche Show.

Ms. Dining Room Table.  Here’s to a good… debate?   It seems an obvious idea, most importantly a self-referencing to give the memebrship an impression of a fight against the elite, would indeed get the cult some publicity.  But it hasn’t as yet spared any more mentions in what is, at the moment, a particularly drought-filled stream — as evidenced by the sparcity of items found googling about.  Are they in a process of regeneration from the fresh new “International” Webcast?

Actually, my impression on just how sparse this sam may be distorted a bit.  I’ve posted a few things to factnet I ordinarily would have hovering here, waiting for publication.  It wasn’t my intention to post at factnet during the reprieve, but I have.  At one poing, “xlcer” made the statement:  I have no idea what happened, but there is nothing, nothing to report on The Larouche World Wide Takeover TOur 2009! today from the google search engine. Which was weird enough, in that it missed this, and the message:

I read it a fourth time. And I wondered why they don’t call themselves dictators with such a demanding message. What kind of training had those extremists gone through? If Obama is Hitler, who are they?
Boink-boink.

I gave myself one little contest on Friday of trying to beat “xlcer” to a posting of a bunch of links.  He barely beat me to it — the time stamp for both posts says “9:01”.  Seeing that he had just posted all the same items, I deleted all but the one link he missed — a mention of Lou Dobbs as possible running mate to Larouche.  Go figure.

Other encounters with the cult.:   As I walked by the table, I said, without looking at the people, “Not nice.”
The man replied, “Obama is going to hell!” (Actually, I think he said some word that included “Obama,” but I didn’t quite catch what he said.)
I shook my head. “Nope, not nice.”
In their defense, they don’t claim to be nice.
In the partisan grenade tossing that comes with the territory of the cult, I don’t know that this claim is true — that that Holocaust image was being waved by Larouchies.  They can prove it, if they will, but I’d advise them to be careful of pretending that all signs that don’t look favorable upon their cause come from this external source.)  Same, frankly, for this commenter:

I went to drop off something at the Post Office there last August and there was a heated discussion going on in front of the building by a group that had anti Obama signs on health care with some of the passers by. The protesters with the signs said they were LaRouche Democrats. One foisted some of their literature on me and said that Obama and Pelosi were beholden to George Soros who was secretly backed by the Rothschilds. So I bet the sign in the image above had its source in this thinking. I didn’t know the Rothschilds existed any more but Larouche’s people had them targeted.

We’re getting a bit of causation confused.  One element to the tea-partys, a man I associate most with spreading and popularizing the Obama Joker image is Alex Jones — and, you know.  For some reason, they have been wanting to tell me what Louis Farrakhan has to say about some matters.  (It is also here that I can fit in this comment.)  So, with that conspiracy lining established, we get this promotional effort for the  latest “historic” “International” Webcast (surely available for viewing in China?), a comment left on prisonplanet news entries at a particular time, two spots at the ready:

Michael Says:
November 11th, 2009 at 11:20 am
Larouche International Webcast on now at http://www.Larouchepac.com Don’t miss it!

How many Alex Jones fans wandered over to view the latest webcast, I do not know, but it does strike me as a fairly pathetic attempt.  I would also be interested in seeing if this message was plastered to other websites of this ilk at that time.

Other things creating the impression of a slowing down the flow of Larouche’s web presence, the current state of their Wikipedia Information battle.  My following of wikipedia deliberations has always been best thought of as observing the cult’s organizational battle to control or influence a popular source of information.  At present, the cult is probably regrouping and retooling to figure out a new method of attack — it is to wikipedia’s discredit that they allowed the last rather nakedly absurd “Leatherstocking” attack to go on for so long and it is their organizational flaw that is exposed by handing them so much deference.  At the moment, we have a good deal of flawed but at least honest good-faith  deliberations on how to handle this tricky topic, what sources to use and how, and what is best spot-lighted.  There is, in this midst, a touching observation upon reading and dealing through the battles with the April 11 Briefing (JN466:  “I am equally struck by how this must have read to Kronberg.”) — and a wholly pointless debate on citing to Tony Papert or Larouche.  We do see the Larouche cult making its attempts — they really need to make John Markham’s counsel to Molly Kronberg as issue — but are effectively called out on for the moment.
And here’s one more item that strikes me as a pointless matter — listing the various epithets the cult’s members get called.  With this debris being moved around, I feel like a quick visit back to brushing off loose-ends of the last Cult Team attempts, as we await the next attempts — note this Sun Myung Moon referencing to the “Executive Intelligence Review” entry.  Funny for a few reasons — former members see some dove-tailing of interests at various times in its history — who popularized the Dukakis Mental Health issue? — depends on who you asked.  In the handful of instances I’ve seen that referenced, the org is short-swifted in favor of the Washington Times.

But the Moon is on a lot of cult member’s minds anyway.  The Moon Explosion brought out some signs of water.  But I am with a lot of people: screw the Moon, go to Mars.  To quote Bill Nye the Science Guy on what the  new scientific development means and what it does not mean — and I think he flubbed this but the idea is still there – “There is so little water, like there may be less water, for example, in the Antarctic desert than there is on the lunar surface. But that there is any water at all is remarkable.” Mars is as dry as the Moon, but we haven’t gone there yet — important if the idea is to advance to places as a species.

I was left wondering if the cult made it over to Al Gore heckling — but the references in the news accounts go to a Tea Party group and a cleverly named “Constructive Tomorrows” foray.  Only one of the signs is invective filled enough to suggest the possibility of Larouche, but “The Masses follow the Asses” apparently originates elsewhere.

In other news and notes, this one goes out to the Leader of the Larouche Cryonics Movement — a movement consisting of one person — you’ll have to wait a while to regenerate his corpse.

This entry was posted on Monday, November 16th, 2009 at 1:21 pm and is filed under The LaRouche Challenge. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.