Another one bites the dust. Okay to speak ill of the dead?

During his life Frankhouser had been convicted of an international fraud scheme, allegedly involved in assassination plots against U.S. government leaders, acquitted of a stabbing a rival Klan leader, lost an eye in a bar fight and waged a battle to get his white supremacist show on public access cable television, according to just a few of the dozens of newspaper clippings in the Reading Eagle archive.

The longtime Klansman and former member of the American Nazi Party was convicted in February 1995, following a four-day federal trial in Boston stemming from allegations he advised a white supremacist’s mother to destroy evidence linking her son to the desecration of synagogues in Randolph and Brockton, Mass., as well as alleged assaults on black Brockton residents.[…]
On February 17, 1988, Frankhouser was sentenced to three years in federal prison and fined $50,000 for advising political extremist Lyndon H. LaRouche Jr. to obstruct a federal grand jury probe into an alleged fundraising fraud scheme.
During the trial, Forrest Lee Fick of Stony Creek Mills testified that he and Frankhouser were asked by a member of LaRouche’s organization to kill former Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger during a flight to Europe.

When asked to comment on the life and his association with Roy Frankhouser, Jr. Lyndon Larouche had this to say:

“This is straight Nazi stuff,” Larouche elaborated. “It’s not a quibble; it’s not an interpretation. This is a direct copy of the philosophy of the Nazis. You cannot duck that issue. This is Nazi stuff.”

While I’m on the subject of recently deceased associates of this cult leader, I bring to attention this weird bit – funny in a disturbingly sick way (as all these things are)– on 1992 vice presidential candidate James Bevel, a career fall from Martin Luther King, Jr to Larouche (at which time he had an “educational program” going on with his children and was committing incest) one of those things you shake your head at:

In 1993/1994 I remember that I sat together with some youngsters from Sweden and Poland. He spoke about sex. The basic idea with what he said to us youngsters, was to say that one had to control once sexlife and sexual instincts in order to become a good political organizer. He said that he used to have sex with cows (!) as a kid, as all other kids had (!), and that almost all young people today (!) have sex in in the same “unscientific” and hedonistic way as he used to have sex with cows (!). “And we did not care if the cow (!) was male or female, as long as there was a hole to stick it in”, I remember he said… Bevel appealed to us young people (I was 24 at the time) to make a revolt against the sexual habits of “today”. Homosexuality, and sex when dating, SEXUAL ATTRACTION, etc, was “unscientific” and a way for the oligarchy (Yes, he spoke about them too!) to control people… Off course, Bevel said that he was “scientific” when he wanted to eradicate lust from sexuality…

“When you grow up on a farm in Georgia, your first girlfriend is a mule,” as the radical anti-abortionist Neal Horseley once said.

Or, it puts the constant references to “Bestial”. And, in what the cult hopes to consider a big historic expedition, Larouche spoke at Central Connecticut State University and asked the question Larouchies have asked me on this blog — DO YOU KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MAN AND ANIMAL? Luckily the LPAC site bullet-points this for me:

The Difference Between Man and Ape: Fire

As simple as that. He could have condensed the lecture to just that one thought. Also that is why he doesn’t have to dwell on his supposed task of the Middle East situation.

From the moment he was invited to deliver the lecture as part of the Middle East policy series, chaired by the distinguished Middle East scholar Prof. Norton Mezvinsky, LaRouche contemplated how best to use the limited time allotted, to deliver the most thought-provoking message.

As you will read below, LaRouche stepped outside of the rigged game of the Middle East per se, to deliver a message, intended to reverberate in the Obama Administration as it prepares for an urgent round of diplomacy, and within governing institutions around the world.
It was in this spirit that Lyndon LaRouche delivered the following lecture, before an audience of approximately 200 faculty, students, and guests of Central Connecticut State University on the afternoon of May 4, 2009.

There would appear to be some squabble with the numbers in attendance at this lecture hall. Observers at the scene and observers of the youtube clip are claiming about 20 or 30 were in attendance. But never mind, it’s on the Internet, which means that it surely will now achieve a mass audience. Youtube commenters, have it:
laroucheyouth The Larouche videos are way under-viewed. What can we do to increase it? Put a link on your facebooks, myspaces, and wherever you chat online. People need to be educated on the current state of affairs in this world!

The focus is on our website. That is the mass education and organizing center.
jmar10420 Let the sheep hand out their green leaflets. When the bottom falls out, they’ll be flocked! Lyndon LaRouche is the truth!

Hey guys. Your cult sucks. Quit that cult and join another cult, please.
Should I link to the youtube video and help alleviate their problem somewhat? Nah. Unless I did, in which case no big deal.
Incidentally, this is being blamed for part of the small attendance:
Student demonstrators gathered outside of Davidson Hall Monday afternoon to protest political activist and philosopher Lyndon LaRouche.
Mostly members of the Youth for Socialist Action protestors were armed with comic book-style fliers depicting LaRouche as “a small-time Hitler”.
LaRouche spoke as part of the CCSU Middle East lecture series. This particular event, unlike the rest of the series, was funded personally by CCSU professor Norton Mezvinsky.
“I know some sharply negative attacks are being targeted at LaRouche here on campus,” Mezvinsky said. “The material being handed out is, at best, problematic factually, and some of it just downright false.”

I think I know what the flyers were — run into them when rumbling online, though quickly checking Chip Berlet’s website it doesn’t appear to be from that site. I question if that’s a particularly worthwhile battle to wage, on the YSA’s part, and if it is if that’s the best way to demonstrate — but that’s their business and they may do what they must.

Norton Mezvinsky — I’ll have to email him and ask him what he was thinking and whether he found this a satisfactory lecture furthering free inquiry (questions rather narrowly construed to those mattes). You can email him too!
…………………………………………

Final Goldman items:Good as far as it goes, here and here — just so long as they know the man is lying quite a bit.If you read more of this little satirical piece than I did, you’ll find him referenced for the sake of putting him in the Democratic Party.

And this guy observed the whole Michael Bloomberg drumbeating. Our old leader of the Larouche Cryonics Movement, Phil Ossifur, provides an inadequate response to his Omniscent Master.

Why do they go after Nancy Pelosi (second to last comment) when Charles Schumer makes a more obvious target, placed aside Soros? (But I should really stop and not be handing them any ideas here.)

This entry was posted on Saturday, May 16th, 2009 at 1:04 pm and is filed under The LaRouche Challenge, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.