«
»

weee! weee! weee! wee–ugh.

In the latest wikipedia editing wars, we have a couple of new Larouche sock puppets.  Keinehexan, who I guess is actually an old sock puppet who had to add an “n”, and who apparently has a desire to violate some wikipedia protocol and good manners:

Do not post what you believe to be a real name of a Wikipedia editor who uses a pseudonym. If you do so again your account may be blocked.   Will Beback  talk  02:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

No, I don’t know the back-story here.  As a rule the identities of the Larouchian sock puppets are of some interest to me (though not so much names as role in the org) because it is a coordinated propaganda offensive.  The identities of wikipedia editors, by dent of being editors have earned their chops and also proven them into that relatively insane and uber-dedicated “Wiki Core”.

The current debate at wikipedia seen here show the attempt to slice the names “Jeremiah Duggan” and “Ken Kronberg” out of the article on “Lyndon Larouche”, in this case to sideline them to “Larouche Movement” — where, presumably, the Larouche Movement would swamp them with, for instance, the current on Russian television and Italian Parliament non-victories.  It appears they desire to do away with Kronberg in its entirety:

Color Me Mauve:  The other thing I would mention, having looked over the two articles (Duggan and Kronberg,) is that the Kronberg case got almost no press coverage, only a couple of minor papers

Presumably our good friend “Revenire” has picked up this line and is running with it with that fairly asinine question “Where is the ‘Justice for Ken’ site?”  Well, I will note the “Kronberg case” appears to be getting frequent press coverage in the press releases of the Larouche Political Action Campaign, so there is that.
Here’s an aside matter that doesn’t really seem to deserve clarification:
 I’m not sure exactly what formal connection exists between LaRouche and the WLYM, but I think I’ve seen him described as its founder and I know he has spoken to them.
Uh huh.  But after that guffaw evaporates we are swerve back, and take it away “Keinhexen”:
The deaths of Jeremiah Duggan and Ken Kronberg have been viciously exploited for propaganda purposes by a small group of people who found collaborators in the British press and apparently at Wikipedia also. Duggan had no connection with the Larouche movement other than to be a casual attendee at a conference. Ken Kronberg was a valued member who had a falling out with his wife, who is now one of the collaborators in the propaganda effort and who has solicited collaboration here at Wikipedia. —Keinehexen
Keinhexen is playing up the slyly stated role that Molly Kronberg had in forming the “Larouche Criminal Trials” page.  Further, and more importantly, the “Falling out with his wife” line is paralleling the statement of our good friend “Revenire” here — stated first here maybe about a year ago with a slight chuckle of “Ooh… I’m bad”, returned here with this viscious little comment:
because he jumped because of a horrible marriage and one molly admits was filled with arguments – never heard of a husband jumping because of a failed marriage? rent a movie, a drama, about the 100s of them each year in the USA
It would appear that’s what’s going around the org… that is “The Line” and there will be no deviation from it.
In other news, the Org has taken a strong line in not bringing the tinpot dictator of a plague stricken country before a war crime charges BECAUSE:

The AU chief’s implicit charge of racist actions against African countries and leaders, is more than backed up by the character and history of the leading sponsors of the ICC, specifically the megaspeculator, drug-pusher, and Nazi collaborator George Soros, and his virtual controller and business partner, Britain’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office Secretary, Lord Mark Malloch-Brown. Soros earned his stripes as an adolescent, working for the Adolf Eichmann apparatus carrying out the extermination of the Jews of Hungary in 1944. This “character-forming” (his words) experience prepared him well for a career in ruthless speculation–and racist genocide.

As for Malloch-Brown, he has taken the point in British Imperial operations such as Georgia’s blitzkrieg against South Ossetia, and other targetings of sovereign nation states, including as an official of the World Bank. At present, he is the point person for the British Prime Minister’s attempt to corral the Group of 20 behind his plans for a new supranational financial dictatorship, as a so-called solution for the world financial breakdown crisis.

It is well-known to all parties in Africa, and to the British imperial stooges Malloch-Brown and Soros, that any indictment of Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir is not only unjust, but also a means of detonating broad genocidal warfare throughout the African continent. This point has been emphasized by human rights activists who have opposed President Bashir, as well as heads of state in Africa, who have issued frequent warnings to this effect.

I have been waiting to see what item the LPAC press-release-machine will insert their story of Molly Kronberg’s perdifidy in the conviction of Lyndon Larouche.  This would be a good one to do so – surely they’d like to parallel the criminal charges brought against Sudan’s president with the current head of the WLYM, and that viscious synarchist assault against both.  But I suspect the reason they won’t do so here in comparison to inserting it into the corruption trial of former Alaska Senator Ted Stevens is that they don’t much care about Ted Stevens, and really only picked up that item of that story to put the “Trial” story out for their internal consumption.  They do care about being a great defender of al-Bashir, though, as they have so many despots — it is their thing — global version of “Operation Fruehmenschen”, which is further the British plot to destroy the World — or the British in tandem with George Soros. 

Further comment that needs to be mentioned:
i said i enjoyed justin’s blog but he’s not like an episode of seinfeld
That’s a good thing, ain’t it?  As per the pop-criticism proferred by “Executive Intelligence Review”:

“In their own literary work, the method of the Night Writers is to drown you in sensation. Their books are full of smells, sounds, and images. Even when they seem to deal with the workings of the mind, it is not cognition they deal with, but, rather, the experience of a parade of internal sensations. Donald Davidson’s complaint to Tate, about Tate’s most famous poem, “The Ode to the Confederate Dead,” made the case in part with his question, “But Allen, where, are the dead?” Television and Hollywood-type cinema use the same method. The idea is to turn you into an impotent spectator of the world, but, more importantly, of your own mind. Although our movies, like our nation’s most recent Presidential election campaign, are filled with lust and gore, they do, as the Critters insist they must, lack passion. In fact, this indifference to violence, perversion, and degradation, seems to be the intention of these productions.

Think, for instance, of the wildly popular television “comedy,” Seinfeld, which almost made a religion of merciless indifference. If they get you, you sit, a spectator at the Gorey massacres of the Colosseum, who has witnessed not only the slaughter of Pagans, Christians, and beasts at the whim of a long succession of degenerate Emperors, but has remained immobile in your seat through the centuries, as the arena itself has rotted and decayed around you.”

No Jerry Seinfeld, indeed.

This entry was posted on Thursday, March 5th, 2009 at 12:21 pm and is filed under The LaRouche Challenge, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

8 Responses to “weee! weee! weee! wee–ugh.”

  1. revenire Says:
    March 5th, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    justin i don’t think the larouche people coordinate their internet activity on wiki or anyplace else – i’ve never heard that and if i do i will tell you believe me

    what would be wrong with that anyway? factnet coordinates their activity, rachel stated “we” want to shut larouche down and that suggests more than just her unless she’s really the queen of england

  2. revenire Says:
    March 6th, 2009 at 7:49 am

    someone should send the ex-mrs kronberg (“umar the unhappy one” like in ditko’s great dr strange series) down to south carolina – see if she can do something about this because i am getting tired of seeing these pass all over the USA and this one has just been introduced so get to it marielle hammett (be sure to tell them about all the arguments you and ken had and what happened to him after the arguments)

    LaRouche’s HBPA Introduced in North Carolina State Senate

    March 5, 2009 (LPAC)– Lyndon LaRouche’s Homeowners and Bank Protection Act was introduced into the North Carolina State Senate Tuesday as SB 180, becoming the 11th state to introduce the legislation this year. Coincidentally, Sen. Larry Shaw, the veteran legislator who introduced it, was elected Chairman of the Board of CAIR, the Council for American-Islamic Relations, on the same day. CAIR is the country’s leading civil-rights and advocacy group for Muslims.

  3. Justin Says:
    March 6th, 2009 at 9:19 am

    HBPA Initiatives are Kicking Ass all across the nation!

    Kentucky HBPA
    Michigan HBPA
    Oregon HBPA
    Ohio HBPA.

    I wouldn’t know what the point of a Coordinating most “Internet Activity”. (Tag team on a message board?) Or Perhaps there was a conversation in the Boiler Room in Leesburg which went?: “How do we get that stupid ‘skull / bones’ blogger to give a rat’s ass about our HBPA Initiative?” “I know! Let’s post an LPAC release which mentions Molly!” Coordinated Internet Activity!

    But the wikipedia edit attempts are certainly coordinated. An interesting exercise would be to wade through the wiki archives and do a history. At the moment, I’ll just … watch… report… what is attempted at wikipedia. It informs quite a bit on the matter of the org. Unfortunately wikipedia editing attempts aren’t good citations for a wikipedia article, a concept that’s like an MC Escher illustration but would do it good for balance.

    Factnet “coordinates” “activity”? What activity, pray tell? xlcer drops a message at the bottom of a blogger wondering about Larouche, coordinated with laroucheplanet spitting out this or that 1967 scrawling — The coordinations are hard to find here.

    I wonder what I will do on Sunday with “The Larouche Challenge”, having broken in the middle of the week with the most important wad.

    This is interesting.: David Byrne has just sent an encrypted message against Larouche, and with the Oligarchy. FANTASTIC!

  4. revenire Says:
    March 7th, 2009 at 9:11 am

    cute on the HPBA – like it

    what is really funny is how FACTnet ex-larouche people (if they are even ex-larouche or something else – no way to tell on a message board at all) moan and groan but then put up stuff like this

    “Actually, the collapse of the Mexican peso in 1994 represents possibly the most hysterically funny irony in all of LaRoucheland. That’s because, actually, Dennis Small, I believe, in his capacity as head of LALC (Latin American Labor Committees), correctly diagnosed what was happening to the Mexican financial system in the two years before the collapse, and basically predicted, for the right reasons, pretty much exactly what would happen, and about when it was likely to happen, and he was right on both counts. Imagine that. The LC actually got a pretty important economic prediction (or forecast) right, really right, unarguably right, and right when most of the world was wrong. But, and it’s a huge but, it was Dennis Small who developed this analysis. By 1994, I was long gone, and have no way of checking how the collapse was covered in terms of whether they pointed out how they had been predicting it, but I have to assume they must have. They still had New Federalist then, and surely they had to have patted themselves on the back for calling the shots on this.”

    so the drop-outs admit the LC was right, and years ahead of anyone else, and then go on to gossip about this one and that one as if they were the experts on the LC

    how many people read FACTnet? the larouche part? having tom cruise’s wild scientology spiel on the front page is something FACTnet should do on every page – they might increase hits that way

    justin i am not going to lie to you: no one has coordinated me, or anyone i know, to go to websites anyplace – that’s paranoia and you’ve really bitten this “cult” aspect hook line and sinker haven’t you?

    no one from leesburg, no one from the Moon, or Mars justin

    things i write are my own, on my own

    give me some credit so i can be a Star too

    byrne is good, check out terry allen (the fourth member of the flatlanders), and hear byrne singing on that – think the CD is called “human remains” and of course, what can i add to eno’s work? he’s just fantastic

  5. Justin Says:
    March 7th, 2009 at 10:03 am

    justin i am not going to lie to you: no one has coordinated me, or anyone i know, to go to websites anyplace – that’s

    You seem to be dwelling on a matter I’ve not bothered with at all — at least since just after your inital appearance, and at any rate would contradict the sarcasm of my first paragraph in my comment, and I don’t know why. But you’ve adjusted the basics of your anonymous identity, so why not?

    so the drop-outs admit the LC was right, and years ahead of anyone else, and then go on to gossip about this one and that one as if they were the experts on the LC

    Actually the funny thing here is that the very next post — I guess the “this one” of your “this one and that one” is a linking to wylm of a far more interesting and relevant item on Larouche ideology– that proposed Canadian Constitution… maybe I’ll dwell on it Sunday? Who knows?

    Several posts later, I come in and throw up the wikipedia discussion material (something I think these interested parties should be alerted about) and then I see that quote-in-quote “eaglebreak” goes through a history of what is being pounded about in Leesburg if those weird etchings in LPAC items and the wikipedia discussions are any indication — the Alexandria Trial ( http://www.factnet.org/vbforum/showpost.php?p=376537&postcount=985 ).

    How many people read factnet?

    Actually I’m more interesting in how many read “skull / bones”. The answer to that question is , um — let me check my statistics. Seven. Seven people read “Skull / Bones”. Thank you, you’ve all been great!

  6. revenire Says:
    March 7th, 2009 at 10:53 am

    lol i am a loyal reader, lucky number slevin!

  7. Harry Says:
    March 10th, 2009 at 10:21 am

    Here is an interesting new blog that exposes some of the frauds of Lyndon LaRouche!

    http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/

  8. Justin Says:
    March 10th, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    I assume you’re “European” on the factnet board, aka the writer of ” http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/ “. Good luck with it, I’ll be reading, as will others — some people in the boiler room in Leesburg, for instance.

Leave a Reply