What, you thought I had some more  elaborate system than that?  But methinks that the Larouche Organization has the phrase “New Dark Ages” keyed in a google search.  Someone at the AP, please post up something write the phrase “Dark Ages” so I can test my theory.

So the debate continues.  This man argues that  the field of Larouchian Economics is best  relegated to sidewalk ranting, said off-handedly as a means for a partisan attack.  This man believes that Larouche is “Possibly One of the best minds in economics today“, I believe relegated by the first man (and about everyone else) to the sidewalk, seeing as Larouche has never worked in the field of Economics Ever, or perhaps not to the sidewalk as to the comments sections of various paranoia-stokers.  Well – he is such a Thorn to the Powers that Be — after all monitored by the government of Sweden and all that.  I have to say, it’s unfair to lump the anti-Fluoridites into the picture, since Fluoridating the Water is indeed a Government Plot to anesticize the public into acceptance of the New World Order whilst Whitening its teeth.

I found a copy of the latest, unless they’ve been so good as to print up a new one, LPAC pamphlet.  The previous possessor of this item — I think it’s called “Doom, Fear, Fear, Doom” — showed the proper respect and correct level of reverence by scribbling a goofy beard and moustache on Lyndon’s face. 

Remind me to go through this pamphlet and comb through the dialouge, and report out the many unnamed luminaries who are said to be asking Lyndon questions.  It’s a silly exercise to be sure, and one that falls on the “Evergreen Pile”.  But, if memory serves, I can report that a functionary of the Confederated Tribes of the Europa section of Alpha Centura asked Larouche what the shape of the table for the proposed meeting between India, China, the US, and Russia was.  And Emperor Xenu asked what the best color to decorate the head of this table might be, where Larouche will sit and dictate Economic instructions for India, the US, Russia, and China to follow.  But these questions pale in importance next to a Phillipine LYM leader’s question on the importance of the Artist in the new Epoch and Renaissance, the answer being that they will furnish the world with the lavish portraits of Lyndon on every Meglev Train and Waterworks Projects.

Since, well, Superbowl Sunday and when last I checked in on this blog, Factnet has exploded in its productivity.  Sort through the last bunch of pages at your leisure.  There is a certain aminus toward Dennis King because of the fundamental difference of opinion that while King believes Larouche has hewed closer to the Adolf Hitler , its argured that this is completely wrong and, indeed, Larouche borrowed more thoroughly from Joseph Stalin.  The problem with the suggestion with Hitler, and reason for discontent, is that it was never a part of anyone in the org’s experience… well, except maybe for things like:

I stood in the elevator as Steinberg told the Jews in a Volkswagen “joke” and didn’t say anything. I knew it was a test. And to be honest I did not know at the time of the extent of my own family’s losses in German gas chambers.

Hm.  If it helps, Larouche’s real life exempliers of good governance, Saddam Hussein for instance, tend to be self-modelled after Stalin and not Hitler.  But really, after a while I begin to suspect a replay of the German — Soviet Pact was in play circa 1973 or thereabouts.

Other than that, I’ll simply link to this here and this here.  I know I posted Part One when “Earnest One”, son of a Luminary in the field of Mathematics, posted it (that would be “New Revelations of Terror Part One”, I assume).  In embryonic form the story was posted once upon a time to this blog, and while I did locate it, I’ll go ahead and pass on linking to it.  The story unspools from there, from about here.  To quote from here, “We now hold the gravest reservations about both the methods and motivation of this group.”

A bit surprisingly, someone emailed me responding to my posting from a 1968 book surveying the American Political Fringe.  “Larouche in it?”  No.  You’d have to wait a few years for him to pop through, and wait still a few more years for him to become the very dictionary definition and thus warranting a large part of a chapter.  Tim Wohlsforth is mentioned as “perhaps the most tedious” of Trotskyite leaders.  The names of various Free School class offerings are listed for minor comedic effect.  If you want to spot Larouche further than that, various ideological underpinninigs surface both right and left — what, him being a composite of a Hitlerite and a Stalinist, or perhaps to fit the “Contrarian” thesis, the ultimate Contrarian of a pro-Stalin Trotskyite.

Back in, well, two weeks probably?  Really, the weekly schedule is becoming bothersome because the googling is drying up.

This entry was posted on Saturday, February 14th, 2009 at 5:41 am and is filed under The LaRouche Challenge, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.