#1: Repeatedly Molly Kronberg is working on a book. Interesting. She probably ought be searching around for a publisher. Perhaps she might look into a publishing outlet in Northern Virginia that has published a ton of … um… esoterica (?), publisher by the name of “Benjamin Franklin Books”, which —

[PAUSE.]

I don’t know if that is a “five percent joke”, a “.00005 percent joke”, or if the context of these things pretty much assures anyone reading this will get it. Including the good folks in the Boiler Room in Leesburg. Hi everybody! Has Tony Papert started labelling his Tabs?

[PAUSE.]

Okay. That is what is called a “Call Back”. You would have to go down one or two entries in this subcategory to find I am referencing myself. A self-referntial footnote which does not amount to much, but we’ve been there before.

#2: An attempted explanation for the end-of-the-line which has been met regarding attempting any line on the current presidential election, post the lack of an appearance of Michael Bloomberg, post the end of the line for the “PUMA Movement” — which, I guess will now individually vote for whomever they will vote for — and with just a blip of a published outline on the emergance of Sarah Palin on the National Stage. Whereabouts Obvious. I’m not much more than a “FACTNET Digest” here.:

This may be due to trying to figure out the upside for calling Palin supporters via the boiler rooms. If you take the WABAC machine to 1979 rememebr that one of the first big fundraising lists we began to boil was composed of Western State supporters of Reagan and people in the oil and gas business.

Palin fits the description of what we used to call.

YAHOOS

Those people were fed a steady diet of anti Trilat, CFR and Bilderberger material as we millked them monthly.

AFTER Reagan won the 1980 election, we created another hat to wear in the boiler rooms based on the RTL supporters . Lyn ran as a Dem who spent millions trying to screw Dems while we were calling up right wing lists to give us money to “defend Reagan” from the Dems and the KGB.

If the Salon crowd takes over the Russian franchise from Lyn, I would expect the Russians to be dropped , become Lyn’s latest enemy as the cult battles Al Gore, Obama and Soros in another concoction of delusions before the final exit.

You’d suppose. It seems he’s charging on for the Russian intrusion into Georgia, which leaves McCain on the sideline (unless he’d want to feign a great riff within the Republican Party to take sides in, as he’s pretended to do with the Democratic Party.) No, Mr. Ossifur’s iteration on this being THE SOURCE for understanding the election (shouldn’t he be ranting about Cryonics?) notwithstanding, they can’t place their chips anywhere in this election, for fun and profit. Biden is an obvious target in attachment with their long time crusade against Obama — Delaware Credit Card Industry? — picked up by your Tarpley and Solon. Not too difficult to frame a conspiracy here. Not that I want to do the job for this totalitarian cult in figuring out what to flog for their “Potemkin Village of a Potemkin Village” and donation stream.

#3: But it seems the look is backward. The “New Direction” declared in closing the door on this election promises all new videos at the l-pac website, the follow-ups to the “1932” video, which had been both a connecting bridge into the “Hillary Clinton for President” cult campaign, as well some odd “Lyn is FDR!!!” thought-process for the dozens of “LYM”ers. New videos for Putin-hugging purpose and, seemingly, preparing to die — always the subtext with this entity these days.

Forget the PUMAs. Now that neither convention has panned out the way Lyn wanted it–no Bloomberg candidacy, no Hillary candidacy, no kidnapping of Obama by British agents, no mysterious McCain illness–anyhow, now that Lyn’s past year of blather on the Presidential campaign has evaporated like morning dew, all the org is talking about is … RUSSIA.

And how Putin saved civilization by invading Georgia.

These people are loony-tunes. Meanwhile, Lyn’s telling his inner elites that it’s only because of him that Hillary stayed in the race.

#4: La Rouche’s cult is his failing – his analysis is brilliant — Tarpley is reasonably humble – his writing is 10 times better an. You lost me with the first two stences there, and the slight contradiction in assessment.

#5:  Hm.  Further illustration of the difference between the “Boomer LaRouche Site” (www.larouchepub.com) and the LYM version (www.larouchepac.com ) is Lyn’s “Virtually No Candidate” statement. Nancy has an article on it posted at the larouchepub site ( http://www.larouchepub.com/other/200…pres_cand.html ) that omits the embarrassing reference to “emotional breakdowns in Leesburg” found in the full version posted at larouchepac (http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2008…candidate.html ) . The larouchepub.com site seems designed to actually try to win people over to LaRouche’s ideas. I’m not sure what the larouchepac site is designed to do. 
I believe this shows that one thing the “pac” site (obstensibly a political action committee operates to bundle up money for electoral candidates, but that doesn’t seem operable here, which theoretically would have had this money being spent to state senate seats and the like) is to wax the wheel of the LYM, hence the jab at the Boomers in the Central Committee is included in the otherwise identical press releases.  How this phrase been deleted by now?

This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 10th, 2008 at 3:28 pm and is filed under The LaRouche Challenge, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.