Curiouser and Curiouser

I: A comment that just came through to the matter of Star Trek’s Robert Beltran and his rather odd career choice:

I think Beltran almost walked when Lyn began to loudly promote the choral work while denouncing the work on drama. I think he was handled by the Boomers and his ego massaged after some of lyn’s more pointed comments got out. I especially remember a cadre school session where lyn made remarks about people in drama wanting to change sex partners and it was better to focus on the discipline of the choral work. If I can find a transcript of the session, I will include Lyn’s words.

Paging Motherskadi, maybe the one person most interested in the matter of Robert Beltran and his connections with Larouche.

II: Other items of note: the feed shows many splogs linking to one of those Larouchian articles entitled “Larouche Challenges Youth: Make a Revolution in Science”.

Which I take to mean to man the wikipedia sites and attempt changes to entries on various scientists to fit Larouche’s cargo cult, and not much else in the realm of “Revolution”.

Infinitesimal?

Actually, referring to anything as a “Cargo Cult” is a sleight to cargo cults, which after all make sense to someone not understanding the world around them with no way of figuring out what those world powers beyond their reach are doing.

III: Persistence did not pay off for some LaRouche followers who were yap-yapping about how LaRouche can save the universe from the Baby Boomers, and how only he can save us all from imminent economic disaster – oh – and yeah – he will impeach Cheney too by the way.

I stopped to point out the Cheney-doings of Patrick Fitzgerald the United States attorney in Chicago.

This lady answered, “Who’s Pat Fitzgerald?”
You will notice that the Larouche reason for Impeaching Cheney, and if you google “Impeach Cheney” Larouche has a site on page one of google searches, now fits around an obscure scandal in Great Britain — something that manages the feat of getting the British Royal Crown in, as well British mps who call for an investigation into the death of Jeremiah Duggan. (Jeremy Duggan?)
The question of who Patrick Fitzgerald is to a LYM reminds me of how the easiest way to detabilize a yute is to ask either questions about the lunacy of the cult or ask a serious question about an important issue’s technicalities. In so many races we used to run candidates in we had eveyone fired up about somtehing like the SDI or increasing exports. We looked like fools when someone would ask a question in a TV debate about something like “do they support a change in the PBA pension funding as per bill 1669”. Our people would quickly mouth off that “if we adopt Lyn’s IDB proposal we would be able to do what needs to be done”

If you asked about an SSI COLA figure you got “Laruche’s Export-Import Bank proposal vis a vis the world wide developmental forces who are fighting the British Dark Ages proposal of Prince Philip would resolve this issue”.

All I could do was cringe and plan my eventual escape as it became clear to me that this was all a parlor game of Lyn , designed not to work except to make worshippers. Lyn would issue memo after memo stating that there are NO LOCAL ISSUES except the election of him to save the USA and humanity as the world faces ” A Thermonuclear War and a depression”. This has been the case from the first time we ran candidates in the 1970s to now. You never see how crazy this is until you leave and then see it again.

IV. If Factnet implodes, the new forum is here.

V. Jeff Steinberg is always on the lookout for more ex-members to re-recruit to his post-LaRouche Steinbergian thinktank. He used the occasion of Ken Kronberg’s funeral to renew or try to renew a lot of acquaintances…. Rather ghoulish. Mostly he’s interested in former NEC and NC members (National Executive Committee and National Committee).

He claims he will “reform” the organization and it will be what it was supposed to be. Of course, it IS what it was supposed to be…. And Steinberg is one of its biggest enablers.

I visualize Krushev’s speech denouncing Stalin for some reason.

Leave a Reply