Contemplating a partial entrant into the world of …
I occasionally run into blog entries items such as this. It is the second item like that that has popped up recently in my blog indexing of “Larouche”, the other being someone, pursuing his blog someone of a conspiratorial bent, who simply wrote “This guy fascinates me”, and a link to larouchepac.
I noted a comment to that one inviting him to a Larouchite cadre meeting. I don’t know if he followed up on it.
Looking at this myspace blog post:
I been going to there since Tuesday(maybe cus of this chick)..
Always because of a chick, isn’t it?
I like what their doing but.. I’m not a political, economical & physics kind of person.. there’s nothing wrong with that, or about them
Is there any “political economical and physics” kind of person out there? It probably doesn’t matter too much. Does she like to sing?
the cult thing(see wiki) is just a slander/rumor..
I’m sure they addressed that issue.
the deploying was fun(Jan 19 @ rockridge)..
*went there with them and saying Impeach the Dick!! (Cheney) lol… haha or whatever corny jokes I can make XD.. yesh I did enjoyed it..
the singing kinda disturbs me.. but bashing Cheney/Bush is cool XD.. haha
We all like to bash Cheney / Bush.
Perhaps I should just move along — nothing to see here. She has noticed the splatter of “cult”, and while not fully rejecting it whole-sale, rejected it in part. Witness:
Quote:
“or him, an economic disaster is just around the corner, and time is so precious that he no longer can have the luxury of regularly being with friends or family for considerable lengths of time—it would be morally wrong for him to spend time on personal concerns.”
I think I need to stay away before get no personal life(time for myself, or friends).. or I can just be part time..
I dont mind school.. just not enough to hate it(school) to quit and go join that movement.. no sir eeeeeee!! lol.. but part time sure..
I gather from looking over this myspace page that she is a Lesbian. In the list of tv shows I see “The L Word”. It is not a slander or slur to state that LaRouche has a history of hating homosexuals. In his 1980s incarnation of appealing to the conservatie end of electoral politics (the appeal to liberals came in with oppositon to the Gulf War, he saw fit to print the following in Executive Intelligence Review (and I read a physical copy, thank you very much): B
The issue of the rights of homosexuals and the lack of rights of the heterosexual — for example, forced abortion and forced sterialization as “population control†measures — seems inextricably liked. The same individuals who would have our children indoctrinated with the notion that homosexuality is an alternative life-style, rather than a perversion, would use every other device in the book to limit population growth, including forced sterialization.
Everyone has free will. They may place that free will under whoever’s tutelege they wish it to be under. I don’t really care too much, but maybe somebody else does.
January 25th, 2007 at 5:44 am
You quoted from an EIR. I would like to know the date on that one, so I can read it in context.
January 25th, 2007 at 9:08 am
I will get back to you on that. But I’m more impressed with the attacks on Dungeons and Dragons, and the specter of Satanism haunting this nation’s youth. (I simply pulled the gay quote from the previous entry over here: http://www.struat.com/election/2007/01/15/who-said-this/ )
January 25th, 2007 at 5:53 pm
EIR Special Report: The Libertarian Conspiracy to Destroy America’s Schools; April 30, 1986; by Carol White and Carol Clery with a special appendix by Lyndon H LaRouche, Jr. Introduction by Hegla Zepp LaRouche. Page 28.
The preceeding paragraph, a paragraph with too many goddamned commas:
The most patent technique for transforming the child into a raving libertarian, is to encourage him to express his or her most infantile sexual impulses. Uppermost in this project is forcing the young person to become tolerant of homosexuality as an “alternative life-style,” if not something to be practiced himself. The fact that the NEA, along with Jeremy Bentham and William Buckley, support the rights of pederests to practice their perversion by giving them a privileged position as teachers, only makes the situation that much worse.
January 29th, 2007 at 9:40 pm
“The most patent technique for transforming the child into a raving libertarian, is to encourage him to express his or her most infantile sexual impulses”
Ironically this is not a bad description of some of the surrealistic anarcho-libertarian organizing tactics depicted in Robert Anton Wilson’s Illuminatus trilogy.
February 5th, 2007 at 9:10 am
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=10945498&blogID=220806791&MyToken=0da3e1a6-c553-4ac1-90bd-3f6507f8b9a4
Even more ironically, the blog post of the dabbling LYMer shows her “pro-choice” opinions, completely at odds with the creeping Heritage Foundation stances taken in the aforementioned EIR. (And, I’ve hard, LaRouche had a ‘pro-life’ organization under his umbrella in the 80s). Political. Parasite.