The LaRouche Doctrine versus the Bush Doctrine
I looked over an old Lyndon LaRouche flyer. I noticed something. If I had it with me, I would transcribe it here… since I don’t, I’ll just have to paraphrase.
The third, and most important part of the LaRouche Doctrine, is that it must be MUST BE named “The LaRouche Doctrine”. Because only LaRouche has the credibility to save the world.
Actually, come to think of it, this may not be too far from the insinuations that we get from the latest “alert of terror threat not applied to color”…
“al-Qaida had such success disrupting the Madrid election, they want to try it here, too.” sayeth John Ashcroft. Which flies us over to “I can tell you one thing. We won’t be like Spain.”
… Which is as much a threat as it is a prediction …
And bounce us over th CNN Grade A reporting:
“there is some speculation that al Qaeda believes it has a better chance of winning in Iraq if John Kerry is in the White House”
… which, of course, suggests that if al Qaeda (or one of its newly decentralized offshoots) does not strike the USA… you can count that as an October Surprise working to install their chosen American politico in office…
Vote Bush / LaRouche for President.
……………………….
Note: to add Kerry into the equation: Recall this bizarre news item.:
“Kerry will kill our nation while it sleeps because he and the Democrats have the cunning to embellish blasphemy and present it to the Arab and Muslim nation as civilisation.”
“Because of this we desire you (Bush) to be elected.”
But then I’d have to move even further back into forgotten news cycles to find that “Discovered Letter” saying “Bush is suffocating us!” or some such, heartening to the Bushistas.
My head spins.